Listen to the article.

I highly doubt that as the monarch of the United Kingdom, you, Charles III, have ever heard my name or read any of my writings. Nevertheless, I felt compelled to write this personal letter to you. Your Majesty, I deeply empathize with your cancer diagnosis. I wish nothing but a long life and complete recovery for you. I admit that I partly wish this for selfish reasons, as your passing would be a bit inconvenient for my eschatological research, for which I have publicly put my name on the beheading block for the past 10 years. Other researchers, such as my American colleagues Monte Judah and Tim Cohen, even longer, around 30 years.

As a public figure, you are surely accustomed to various accusations, so perhaps ‘Antichrist’ is not one that would warrant a defamation lawsuit. According to Robert Jobson’s 2018 book, Charles at 70: Thoughts, Hopes and Dreams, you are “deeply concerned about born-again evangelical fundamentalist Christians” who take the Bible literally.¹ Perhaps people like me is one reason for your supposed concern about “fundamentalist Christians”. I have never even met you, so I admit that demonizing a public figure without knowing them personally is a bit morally questionable.

However, as a Christian, I strive to take seriously passages from the Bible such as “Speak not evil one of another, brethren. He that speaketh evil of his brother, and judgeth his brother, speaketh evil of the law, and judgeth the law: but if thou judge the law, thou art not a doer of the law, but a judge.” (James 4:11). Paul also warned us not to pass judgment on our neighbors prematurely and hastily: “ Therefore judge nothing before the time, until the Lord come, who both will bring to light the hidden things of darkness, and will make manifest the counsels of the hearts: and then shall every man have praise of God (1 Corinthians 4:5). If I have sinned against you in this respect, I ask for forgiveness from the Almighty and from Your Majesty.

Personally, I have nothing against you. I hope that your name would be written in the Lamb’s book of life and that we could eventually meet in heaven and laugh together at my own foolishness. I have a sense of humor, so I can laugh at myself too. I love you in Jesus Christ, for we are both sinners who need God’s grace to be saved from the judgment of hell. Perhaps I have been greatly mistaken about you and you are much more righteous in the eyes of our Creator than I am. If this is the case, I ask your forgiveness again for speaking ill of you and demonizing your persona.

And whatever kind of person you are, I also strive to respect the office that God has given you. I hope that you will honor the seriousness of that office until the end of your life and give honor and worship to God alone, as you vowed in your holy coronation oath when you knelt before the Almighty and acknowledged the kingship of Jesus Christ, which surpasses the authority and majesty of earthly kings. I hope that you respect the gravity of that oath and give all glory and worship to God alone, as you swore in May 2023. The Latin motto Soli Deo Gloria, Glory to God alone, has also been the principle that has guided my calling. Apostle Peter taught,”Honour all men. Love the brotherhood. Fear God. Honour the king” (1 Peter 2:17). Paul also urged us to be subject to the governing authorities, “For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God” (Romans 13:1).

Of course, there are exceptions, and the Bible also instructs us to obey God rather than men (Acts 5:29). Therefore, Christians should not obey an authority that commands us to act against our conscience and kneel before the kings of this world instead of before God. Our Lord Jesus Christ’s kingship is not of this world, as He told Pilate (John 18:36). However, I did not demonize your persona thoughtlessly without sufficient evidence to support my claims. Some of the evidence I have collected against you has been based on your biographies, the letters from your close relatives such as the late Princess of Wales, and her interviews about you, or interviews with former members of the royal household, as well as your own writings, or your dubious friends such as the pedophile and serial rapist Jimmy Savile, or the oil tycoons who support Middle Eastern terrorism.

Some of my evidence has also been connections arising from the end-time prophecies of the Bible, in which I have found several similarities to your persona regarding the satanic end-time figure referred to in the Scriptures by names such as the man of lawlessness, Antichrist, and the Beast (among numerous other titles). End-time biblical research is undeniably very captivating and addictive because it is like assembling a jigsaw puzzle where many different researchers have tried to piece together the correct picture by connecting various pieces. It also stirs up a lot of disagreement among Christians. But the danger, of course, is that if I connect incorrect pieces, it easily forms a distorted big picture, which in the minds of men can also justify demonization of public figures like you.

But I have been willing to take this risk because I believe in the literal fulfillment of the end-time prophecies of the Bible, and therefore I also strive to take as literally as possible its numerous prophecies about this deceiver of the end times, who deceives the whole world with his false message of peace. Also in this respect, the biblical criteria of that person best fit you, Your Majesty, because you have acted according to your own words as a “defender of all faiths.” And if your actions for world peace have been sincere, then all of that is certainly commendable. But only God knows the thoughts and intentions of each person’s heart.

I do not claim to be God, so I cannot know the true intentions of your heart and the real motives behind your actions. I have only sought to build a big picture by connecting various dots. For example, why did your late wife Diana believe that you were planning her murder, and why did she die exactly as she believed you would kill her, in a “car accident”?² Was she simply insane? Am I insane, or perhaps, with all due respect, are you insane?

Why did you start strangling your valet Ken Stronach, with madness in your eyes, after you had misplaced your own cufflinks, causing your servant to hide in the linen closet in fear for his life?³ We all have bad days when our patience wears thin, but resorting to physical violence is far from the composed gentlemanly demeanor you have presented yourself in public. It is not at all Christian behavior, and I greatly doubt that you are even a true Christian when you praise the ancient Egyptian and Greek pagan gods in your own book and quote occult and Gnostic works that have nothing to do with Christianity.

Why do you think, that you have the right to live like King Louis XIV, keep numerous servants, and complain to them about the smallest discomfort, while demanding the rest of the world to live more frugally “to save the planet”? What does hypocrisy have to do with saving the planet or environmental conservation? I know that your fifty-year mission to save the planet has been a very dear cause to you, and in that you have probably found meaning and purpose to your life in the same way that I have found purpose to my life by revealing your true character. But I would take your mission a little more seriously if your personal lifestyle were more in line with what you preach to others. I would also ask, do you even believe in the Judeo-Christian dogma of the sanctity of life, when your pantheistic dogma of the sacredness of nature seems to take precedence over that.

When you said in your book Harmony, which you wrote in 2010 with Tony Juniper and Ian Skelly, that governments and decision-makers should “reduce the human population,”⁴ I would advise you to listen more to thinkers like Elon Musk and Jordan Peterson, who have spoken out against Malthusian overpopulation and urged people to have more children to prevent population decline. Jordan Peterson has said that the idea of world overpopulation indirectly calls for genocide, because it implies that some population or group of people in the world is unnecessary or a burden, or that even humanity itself is a cancer on our planet, as your Malthusian comrades at the Club of Rome stated in 1974.⁵

Perhaps your late father meant it literally when he told a German journalist in 1986 that he wanted to return to the world after his death as a deadly virus to help reduce overpopulation. Well, his wish came true shortly before his death, when the Covid-19 pandemic broke out from a Wuhan lab and globally killed seven million people. When you liken our planet to a “sick patient” in your speeches and say that “we need a ‘me-mentality’ at a global level in our fight to create a cleaner and healthier planet,” does this “me-mentality” include, for example, a collectivist notion that the human rights of certain individuals or groups are overshadowed by the “sick planet’s” rights and survival? As a Christian, I value the preservation of every individual human life – including yours. Therefore, I also hope that your doctors succeed in removing the cancer in time and saving your life.

However, hopefully you yourself do not believe that our planet has cancer – humans – that should be removed from it “to save the life of our sick planet.” Hopefully you believe that every human life is as valuable as your own life. If you truly believe this, then I have no problem with you, and I apologize for misunderstanding your thoughts. But why has your friend and advisor Jonathan Porritt publicly praised China’s human-rights-disregarding one-child policy? Or do you disavow his comments, when he stated, “Couples who have more than two children are being “irresponsible” by creating an unbearable burden on the environment.”?

Were my own parents irresponsible when they had three children? My eldest brother ended up taking his own life in December 2020 after a severe episode of depression. Was he too an “unbearable burden on the environment”? If you believe that some people’s lives are a burden on our environment, then why wouldn’t your own life be a burden on our environment? Aren’t you, after all, a much greater burden on our planet in light of how much the maintenance of your privileged life requires over-consumption of our natural resources. But I do not believe you are a surplus on our planet. I do not believe you are a burden on our planet. I hope you don’t think the same of me and millions of others.

If we agree on these issues, perhaps we can bury the hatchet and shake hands in reconciliation. If you forgive the misunderstanding of your thoughts and character, and explain to me why I was so wrong about you, then I promise on my part to stop demonizing your character and withdraw my book from the market. Admitting our human fallibility can be very painful at times, but it can also be a very liberating experience. Both you and I are not gods but mortal human beings. We are not all-knowing, but make mistakes and draw wrong conclusions about each other and the nature of reality.

With love and compassion, your fellow human Samuel Tuominen

Long live the king!

Footnotes

1. Robert Jobson, Charles at 70: Thoughts, Hopes and Dreams, page 12 ↩︎
2. https://wikispooks.com/wiki/The_Mishcon_Note ↩︎
3. Christopher Andersen, The King: The Life of Charles III, pages 204-206 ↩︎
4. Charles, Prince of Wales, Harmony: A New Way of Looking At Our World, p. 28 ↩︎
5. Mankind at the turning point : the second report to the Club of Rome, p. 1 ↩︎