A Christian friend of mine interviewed me in his home almost four weeks ago as a follow-up to an interview I did last December where I discussed the numerous biblical evidences of King Charles as the probable Antichrist of the prophetic Scriptures of the Bible. However, the previous interview did not fully address how I interpret Daniel’s visions in light of the most significant events in church history and how that relates to my interpretation of King Charles as the ultimate Antichrist of Daniel’s visions. I added a number of different diagrams and additional notes to the interview to better illustrate the issues under discussion.

Watch the video on YouTube.

Note: My argument is not that Charles III is the Antichrist, but that he is the probable Antichrist. This means that the biblical and historical criteria support this claim more than for any other person alive today. I encourage every listener to explore the subject for themselves with a skeptical but open mind, to check out the validity of my arguments, and to draw your own conclusions about their plausibility. Although there was also talk of the Roman Church and the papacy in the interview, about which many Roman Catholic Christians are likely to disagree with me, I myself have nothing against Catholic Christians (Roman or Greek Catholic), and to me they are brothers and sisters in Christ as long as they share the love of our Saviour Jesus Christ, the common head of the Church. Personally, I have never taken a judgement on who are the true sheep of Christ based on doctrinal differences between major Christian denominations.