READING TIME: 23 MINUTES

At the beginning of the year, I published my apology for being wrong. My apology concerned my earlier beliefs that Trump would return to the presidency before Biden’s first term ends. I am not retracting my apology or setting new dates for Trump’s return. To be honest, I no longer have enough faith in Trump returning to presidency before January 2025 (if even then). However, I have not apologised for claiming that the 2020 presidential election was stolen. Indeed, I have never doubted for a moment that this was the case. Much evidence of this has already been offered, for example in Dinesh D’Souza’s documentary 2000 Mules. Nor has any election expert been able to explain the so-called “drop and roll” phenomenon that occurred after election day, where Biden first received a large number of votes at one time, which lifted him from a several percentage point deficit to a lead. For the next 48 hours, the postal votes received by Trump and Biden increased in exact proportion to each other, so that Biden would have held that lead until the end. The same phenomenon occurred in last year’s midterm elections (this graphic illustrates the point well).

I wrote in January: “Personally, I have already lost faith and interest in the prophecies of Trump’s return. If such a miracle were to come true again, I will take my words back and apologise my apology. But as long as I keep stretching the goalposts after the previous ones expire, I will only make myself look like a self-deluded denialist of reality.” I further elaborated on these cynical sentiments in the comments I received on my blog as follows:

And am I serious that I have lost interest in the prophecies of Trump’s return? Yes. I meant that I still find the numerous fulfilled prophecies from Kim Clement, and some others, very interesting. I also stressed the point already in this update that no one has yet been able to offer me a valid rebuttal as to how he was able to predict so many things right unless he was a true prophet of God. By losing interest, I meant that I am tired of dealing with and following the issue in the hope that there will be some supernatural twist. If that were to happen, I would start commenting on it again on my blog.

So I have never said that Trump and his supporters were wrong in their belief that there was injustice in the 2020 elections and that there was therefore a legitimate basis for the protests of the January 6 protesters (not violence or rioting, but the “peaceful and patriotic” protests that Trump incited his supporters to in Washington). I just had to bow to the fact that corruption and injustice – the enemies of all American patriots and lovers of freedom in the so-called ‘deep state’ – won the battle this time. Whether it will be a final victory of the war or just a short-term victory of the battle remains to be seen. But Trump’s prophecies were not the only reason why I became interested in Donald Trump back in 2015. ‘

What attracted me to Trump was that he was talking about many of the same things I had written about in my blog even before his emergence at the centre of world politics. Trump’s rise to power effectively exposed the whole existence of the deep state to the general public. NSA leaker Edward Snowden said in 2018: “As for this idea that there is a Deep State, now the Deep State is not just the intelligence agencies, it is really a way of referring to the career bureaucracy of government. These are officials who sit in powerful positions, who don’t leave when presidents do, who watch presidents come and go, they influence policy, they influence presidents and say: this is what we have always done…”

“When we look at the case of Trump, who is perhaps the worst of politicians, we see the same dynamic occurring. This is a president who said the CIA is the enemy, it’s like Nazi Germany, they’re listening to his phone calls, and all of these other things… [many “journalists” laughed at the Trump’s tweets about Obama’s intelligence spying on his presidential campaign, even though the 2022 report by Special Counsel John Durham proved Trump was absolutely right on that issue]. And this gets to the central crux of your question, which is: can any president oppose this?  The answer is certainly. The president has to have some familiarity going in with the fact that this pitch is going to be made, that they are going to try to scare him or her into compliance. The president has to be willing to stand strongly on line and say: ‘I was elected to represent the interests of the American people, and if you’re not willing to respect the constitution and our rights, I will disband your agency, and create a new one’. I think they can definitely be forced into compliance, because these officials fear prison, just like every one of us.”

I have also written that the US Deep State itself would be just one part of a wider international shadow government that seeks to control the decision-making of democratic nations behind the scenes, apart from the will of the people. Readers may already know some of these secret movers of the politics of nations such as the Bilderberg Group, the Trilateral Commission or other such secretive organisations. Nowadays, more is said about the World Economic Forum and its Great Reset project, whose real instigator was the then Prince Charles, the current monarch of England, and not Klaus Schwab. Along with Donald Trump, now another major presidential candidate, President John F. Kennedy’s nephew Robert F. Kennedy Jr, who plans to unseat Joe Biden as the Democratic Party’s front-runner in next year’s presidential election, has spoken openly about the fact that the same Deep State killed both his uncle and his father, as “conspiracy theorists” (a term originally coined by the CIA in an attempt to denigrate critics of the lone gunman and “magic bullet” theories) have argued for decades. RFK has even hinted that he himself might be assassinated by US intelligence agencies, as his father and uncle were.

In my blog in October 2017, I said that “early critics of the CIA called it ‘a branch of British intelligence’ and ‘America’s Gestapo’”. In the same article, I reported on President Trump’s release of the secret CIA JFK documents, which provided further evidence for the conspiracy theorists’ claims of more than one shooter. I also documented the Kennedy assassination’s links to the British monarchy, citing figures such as Sir William Stephenson, William J. Donovan and Allen Dulles, early pioneers of British-American intelligence. In May 2019, I published an article entitled Prince Charles to meet US President Donald Trump in June. At the same time, the President begins to realise the central role of His Majesty’s Government in the international conspiracy to sabotage his re-election.

At the time, President Trump gave speeches to the press in which he accused the UK government of interfering in the 2016 election and spying on his presidential campaign. In April 2019, he tweeted the following:

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1121006942502182913?t=bgx7TibqyhhYpnCGr-LN3Q&s=19

A report by John Durham last year has confirmed the validity of Trump’s allegations and this was in fact already revealed in April 2017 by the British left-wing Guardian newspaper as well as by CNN. All this was reported in the mainstream press in the context of the so-called Russiagate, although later that Russiagate (a conspiracy theory propagated by the mainstream media about a criminal conspiracy between Trump and Putin against Hillary Clinton) was revealed to have been a disinformation campaign funded by Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign to justify Trump’s political “witch hunt”. The timing of all this is very interesting. Indeed, Trump met the Queen of England in person at Buckingham Palace just weeks after he accused the UK government of spying on his presidential campaign.

Although President Trump is known as an Anglophile who has been a lifelong admirer of the British monarchy, he must have been aware that Elizabeth II was the de facto head of both the British government and the country’s intelligence services during the period when it was spying on Trump’s campaign in conjunction with the Obama administration. Anyone who has seen the James Bond films knows that British intelligence (GCHQ/MI5/MI6) is also known as Her Majesty’s Secret Service. In public interviews, however, Trump has been generous in his praise of the late Queen and even Charles, although he does not share his environmental thinking. Trump has been publicly critical of only Prince Harry and Meghan, who are known as the left-wing “woke royals.”

People’s images about Trump range from the unstable idiot to the ‘stable genius’ as he once described himself. While few Trump supporters see him as an idiot, most of them see him as a rather imperfect individual, which is perhaps part of the appeal of his character. It is easier for people to identify with imperfect people than with perfect people on the surface. People who present themselves as too immaculate and pure arouse in us the suspicion that it is just a smokescreen to hide the skeletons in their closets. Trump’s sometimes somewhat childish way of communicating on social media, or his tactic, borrowed from school bullies, of inventing nicknames for his political opponents, has been the source of amusement or shame rather than irritation among his supporters.

The main criticism of his supporters has come mainly from Trump’s poor judgement of people. He often chose for his government the “swamp creatures” he promised to drain from Washington. This is reflected, among other things, in the fact that many of Trump’s own inner circle eventually turned against him. Even his vice-president Mike Pence (a prime example of these previously mentioned ‘perfect people’), who presents himself as a devout Christian. Pence, who with his current paltry 5% approval rating is set to challenge Trump, who has a 53% approval rating, has publicly criticised the former president for his actions following election day, even though Pence himself in his January 4 speech claimed to share Americans’ concerns about the 2020 election and promised to hear evidence of it in Congress (below Dr. Steve Turley’s excellent video here).

Alongside this, a very different image of President Trump has been circulating among his supporters. In this view, he is a “stable genius” playing “four-dimensional chess” who is constantly four steps ahead of his enemies. Even when he makes mistakes, they are merely deliberate errors to mislead his enemies. At times, this image of Trump has taken on an almost cult-like quality where he is portrayed as an almost semi-divine figure, operating on a completely different level of reality from most of the rest of the world. For example, in the more recent infamous QAnon movement (whose beliefs I never personally subscribed to), Trump was seen in precisely the aforementioned light, together with his secret cabal of “white hats” who presumably posted cryptic riddles to Trump supporters on obscure internet forums (Q in that movement’s beliefs represented either a mysterious figure or an insider group within the US intelligence services sympathetic to Trump’s MAGA agenda).

Although I was not a follower of that Q movement, I admit to having promoted sometimes an almost transcendental image of President Trump on my blog. Partly, perhaps, because his foreign policy was by many measures a very ingenious ‘4D chess’. For example, the ISIS caliphate was destroyed largely because Trump made a $350 billion arms deal with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (which I initially criticised) on his first diplomatic state visit. How so? Because Trump knew the Saudis were funding ISIS in an attempt to curb the growth of Shia Iran’s influence in the region (this was revealed by the Wikileaks leaks of Hillary Clinton’s emails that helped Trump win in 2016). Trump did not make his deal with the Saudis because he turned a blind eye to the Saudis’ clandestine support for Sunni terrorists, but because the terms of the deal included the Saudis ending their support for terrorism and cracking down on its ideological or financial backers.

This deal also led to the rise of the reformist Mohammed Bin Salman as crown prince of Saudi Arabia and the Abrahamic agreement between Israel, Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates (which I anticipated in my blog years ahead of). Trump won strong support from both Israel and the Arabs for his anti-Iran stance (he cancelled the Obama administration’s Iran deal) and this in turn served as a catalyst for diplomatic rapprochement between Israel and the Arab countries. By killing Iranian terrorist leader Qassem Suleiman and ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi (as well as by retaliating against Syrian Bashar al-Assad’s military forces), President Trump also sent a clear message to America’s other enemies. This led to North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un finally agreeing to meet with him, and prevented also Russia invading its neighbours (peace through strength) as Putin did under presidents Bush, Obama and Biden. In international politics, nothing happens by chance. It is all a game of geopolitical chess.

This very romantic image of Trump as a master of 4D chess circulated among some MAGA zealots even after he “lost” the election to Joe Biden. Instead of losing in a fair election to the “sleepy” and “low-IQ” Joe as he called him (the view of mainstream media journalists), or instead of being outsmarted by the deep state and globalist power machines conspiring against him behind the scenes by stealing the election (the view of moderate MAGA people), President Trump knew his enemies’ plans in advance and allowed it to happen in order to entrap them (the view of MAGA extremists). So Trump prepared for election fraud years in advance and made the necessary preparations to catch the fraudsters so that the corruption and evil of the Deep State would be exposed to the whole world.

The past two and a half years have shown that such theories were, in the end, rather exaggerated nonsense. Or were they? Every now and then, hints emerge that this incredible narrative, which sounds like a Hollywood conspiracy thriller, might be true after all (whether or not it is just wishful thinking). I refer now to a video that was shared by Donald Trump himself on Truth Social, a social media platform he founded. The video was accompanied by Trump’s following twee… or truth: ““Dr. Jan Halper-Hayes is fantastic. Everyone has got to watch her interview on election fraud with the poor sap who got taken apart by her. Thank you Don Jr. for putting this masterpiece out for the public to see. WITCH HUNT!” Dr. Jan Halper Hayes makes some incredible claims in the interview.

She refers to things that everyone already knows, such as Dinesh D’Souza’s film 2000 Mules, released last year, which provides evidence for the electoral fraud. Or the fact that several states changed their election laws just before the election, in violation of the US Constitution. But she also mentions things we had no previous knowledge of. First, she claims that Trump’s enemies made a crucial mistake in suing him over the 2020 election, because the ex-president would now have the opportunity to re-litigate the case again in court. The GB News interviewer echoes the mainstream media narrative that 60 court cases have already refuted Trump’s election fraud allegations. Dr Hayes replies:

Okay wait a minute. Everyone [in] the media goes oh there were 60 court cases that were rejected. No there were three. He won two, he lost one. 57 were never heard because they had no standing and standing means that the person bringing the case has to claim some kind of impact or injury. So it’s really you know the media did that and they’re great at doing that but it it was a fallacy in there and the thing is that.

She also hints that Trump would have some trump cards up his sleeve that he would now be able to present in court:

It’s a great mistake by US Department of Justice Special Counsel] Jack Smith that he’s done that absolutely great see. The thing is, think about Edward Snowden and all the information he had. Think about the fact that our military, our Department of Defense, Space Force. If you think that they don’t have the actual real results from the election, then you’re fooling yourself.

According to Dr Hayes, the new branch of the defence establishment set up by Trump in 2019, the Space Force for cybersecurity in space (which was both derided and praised as a “Star Trek project” borrowed from science fiction films), would have secret information relating to the 2020 elections. Since Trump himself created the military department in question, and since he seems to confirm Dr Hayes’ claims, perhaps he knows something that others don’t yet. Dr Hayes, whose interview Trump praised as a “masterpiece”, also claimed that this was a trap for the Deep State:

You know, the thing is, he [Trump] didn’t try to subvert anything. What he’s really done, is, he’s set up the Deep state to come out and that’s why we’re seeing all these things. I mean, it was revealed with whistleblowers and Hunter Biden’s ex-best friend that in the head of Burisma gave Joe and Hunter Biden 10 million bribe in 2018. Hunter… I mean Joe is on TV publicly saying that he threatened that unless they got the prosecutor fired that he wasn’t going to let them have their 1 billion in support. In 2019 Trump calls Zelenski to find out about what went on to get the prosecutor fired and he gets impeached. I mean that’s we’ve lived with it for a long time.

For many people who follow American politics, the Burisma issue is already very familiar information. In contrast, the idea that Trump has deliberately set a trap for his enemies sounds more like a Q-movement’s conspiracy narrative. Either Trump has already begun to dement like Biden, or then he knows what Dr Hayes is talking about here. Hayes claimed that Trump has been preparing for this since 2018:

On September 12 2018 Trump created an executive order within that he outlined in future elections any kind of foreign or domestic interference specifically for the 2020 election. So we say, how did he know some of these things were going to happen? Election Integrity on both sides of the aisle is tough, it’s really tough but what this has done is it’s opened the door for Trump to present his case [in court]… I sat on a task force at the Department of Defense and the thing is they’ve got the goods they’ve got the goods and Trump knew that if he presented any of the goods early on we’d have a civil war, that he really felt that the people needed to see how bad it could get.

Alongside all this, Dr Hayes suggests in an interview (with Trump’s endorsement) that the late monarch of the UK, Trump’s 2019 visit to the UK and even the Pope had something to do with all this:

Let me say something about this 2020 election. [Thing] is that Biden is a legitimate president but he’s a legitimate president of what is now the bankrupt U.S corporation and that was a treaty in 1871… They [in media] made fun of him [Trump] because they assumed he broke protocol and walked in front of the queen. No, if you go back and look at it, you will see he looked at her, she gave a wave with her hand, he proceeded, she took a couple of steps, he stopped and he waited for her to join. That was an optic to tell us that he then was going to bankrupt the U.S corporation because it was the Vatican, The crown and the U.S that was part since 1871, and we were giving you our tax dollars we were paying back you know we forget this tea party, and without taxation, without representation, we owed you a lot of money because you helped us in the Civil War. And so that is what Trump told the queen: “I’m ending this. We’re dissolving this Corporation. We’re going to go back to being a Republic and we’ll all be separate. The pope wasn’t happy. You should find the picture of him visiting the pope. It took 650 planes to remove our gold from the Vatican Bank.

WHAT!? What does the Vatican or the Queen of England have to do with the 2020 US presidential election? And why does Dr. Hayes speak of the “US Corporation” as if it were a separate entity from the Republic founded in 1776? To the general public this may be some gnostic nonsense, but those more familiar with history know that Dr Hayes is telling the truth. The United States of America, founded in 1776 and independent from the colonial rule of George III of England, was transformed after the American Civil War back into a US corporation under the authority of the British Crown by the Treaty of 1871. Wikipedia describes the 1871 treaty as follows:

International law scholar John Bassett Moore called this treaty ‘the greatest real and immediate arbitration treaty the world has ever seen’… These rules influenced the Berlin Congress of 1878, and the precedent set by these rules would eventually grow into the League of Nations and the United Nations… The treaty laid the foundations for the Great Convergence, the convergence of British and American interests.

For a slightly less laudatory description of the historical significance of that treaty, see the 2016 article The United States became a foreign corporation in 1871. The article basically claims that the US government has been a corporation owned by the British Crown, the Vatican and international bankers since 1871. These entities have exploited the US national debt to keep it on a short leash for the benefit of international bankers, the Vatican and the British Crown, not the citizens of the United States. A couple of paragraphs from the article:

The UNITED STATES government is basically a corporate instrument of the international bankers. This means YOU are owned by the corporation from birth to death. The corporate UNITED STATES also holds ownership of all your assets, your property, and even your children. Does this sound untrue?… The Sovereign People have been deceived for hundreds of years into thinking they remain free and independent, when in actuality we continue to be slaves and servants of the corporation.

Treason was committed against the People in 1871 by the Congress. This could have been corrected through the decades by some honest men (assuming there were some), but it was not, mainly due to lust for money and power. Nothing new there.

I am saddened to think about the brave men and women who were killed in all the wars and conflicts instigated by the Controllers. These courageous souls fought for the preservation of ideals they believed to be true — not for the likes of a corporation. Do you believe that any one of the individuals who have been killed as a result of war would have willingly fought if they knew the full truth? Do you think one person would have laid down his life for a corporation? I think not. If the People had known long ago to what extent their trust had been betrayed, I wonder how long it would have taken for another Revolution. What we need is a Revolution in THOUGHT. We change our thinking and we change our world.

Conclusion

So is the United States finally breaking free from the grip of these international bankers and returning from the US Corporation back to being a republic again? Did President Trump’s visit to the United Kingdom, a few years before the Queen’s death, have any greater significance than a formal dinner with the president’s youthful idol? Did president Trump, who idolises royalty, know after all about the secret power of the British monarchy behind the US goverment? This is what Trump just seemed to be implying.

If he was aware of this, then he should be even more aware of the leading role of King Charles III behind the totalitarian project of the Great Reset to destroy the independence and freedom of America and all nations of the world once and for all (especially since it is totally in the public domain). So have Trump’s laudatory public statements about the Queen and Charles also been part of the “4D chess master’s” diversionary campaign to lead the globalist elite into a trap?

I have to admit that these speculations are beginning to sound too fantastic even for my own ears. Perhaps Trump is, after all, just an unstable goon who lost to the confusedly babling “low-IQ Joe”, and will continue to lose. But before the Orange Man is dressed in orange and sentenced to hundreds of years in prison for “planning a coup”, at least allow me the pleasure of playing with such wild fantasies.

Similar blog articles from the past years:

• Will Trump’s victory mark the biggest upheaval in Washington and the international order since World War II? And how is all this predicted in Bible prophecy? Will Prince Charles soon emerge as the strongman of a United Europe?
  Will the British monarchy try to overthrow the second American revolution? Evidence of election fraud traces back to the British monarchy once again.

---