Listen to this article
I have heard of this amusing theory before: In 2015, our planet supposedly passed through a “wormhole” and entered a comedic parallel reality. Ten years ago, many would had crack up if a time traveler from 2023 had told them that reality TV star Donald Trump would become the President of the United States, healthy young people would drive alone in cars with masks on, fearing a virus with over 99% probability of survival, and the world’s richest man would join forces with America’s most famous “conspiracy theorist” who believed in staged school shootings, to plan the colonization of Mars and the interstellar “Star Trek civilization”. Technology pioneer Elon Musk, who dreams of a multiplanetary civilization, just reinstated Texan Alex Jones’ Twitter account and engaged in a two-hour discussion with him on the live platform, X.
However, they did not argue about whether anyone died in the tragic school shooting that occurred at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut in 2012, where 20-year-old Adam Lanza cold-bloodedly executed 20 children aged 6-7. But Elon Musk did ask Jones to clarify his stance and condemned the denial of school shootings as morally wrong and cruel. It was precisely for this reason that he did not reinstate Alex Jones’ account when he bought Twitter for $44 billion and reinstated the accounts of thousands of censored conservatives, including Donald Trump’s Twitter account. Musk responded to people demanding the reinstatement of Jones’ account in November 2022.
Content
- Musk’s gradual awakening from the Matrix
- Alex Jones and the Real Sandy Hook Hoax
- Alex Jones’s Surreal Discussion with Elon Musk
- Pessimistic versus optimistic vision of the future
- Expanding Humanism versus Declining Antihumanism
- Is Musk a Transhumanist?
- Endless resources or limited resources?
Musk’s gradual awakening from the Matrix
This heartbreaking opening about a personal tragedy seems to imply that Musk sincerely believed that about Alex Jones because he had been portrayed in the mainstream media as a monster who intentionally lies about school shootings and uses children’s deaths as means to grow his bank account. Musk’s “awakening from the matrix” has been a gradual process. In the 2010s, he was still the favorite of the left when he attacked the big oil industry to grow his electric car business. Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney famously attacked Musk in the 2012 presidential debates. In 2019, Musk praised 16-year-old Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg, saying she had “more sense and heart than most political leaders.”
During the 2020 pandemic, he began to awaken from this mainstream media-maintained matrix. He urged his followers to take the “red pill” famous from the Matrix movies, which freed people from a false reality, questioned the rationality of government Covid countermeasures, and said he would be voting Republican for the first time in his life. He became one of the most influential critics of the far-left woke ideology and also began speaking about the temporary necessity of the oil and gas industry to preserve civilization. He started speaking out against the Biden administration, mainstream media, globalization, and overpopulation myth.
He also criticized the World Economic Forum as an “unelected world government” that people never asked for and don’t want interfering in their lives. He has also criticized globalist projects like ESG scoring against free-market capitalism. In February 2023, he sent a video message to the annual World Government Summit (the actual name) held in Dubai, stating that establishing a world government is not a good thing in his opinion but rather a goal that “leads to the end of civilization.” You can find more about Musk’s political views in my video compilation below from the previous year.
Now Musk is starting to realize that the media also lied about Alex Jones, who has been one of the most loathed figures in the mainstream media, alongside Donald Trump (and now also Elon Musk). This is significant because Alex Jones has been warning about the global occult elite’s plans for world domination for over 25 years. I first became acquainted with his documentary films and Infowars news site in the early 2000s when I was a teenager. The things Jones mentioned were already familiar to me as I had read all of Pekka Lahtinen’s books on the New World Order. For partly the same reason, I also became interested in the British royal family as no many other sources besides Alex Jones and his fellow “tin foil hats” spoke about its occult darker side.
Alex Jones and the Real Sandy Hook Hoax
Now, 20 years later, these issues have moved from the margins to the mainstream, being discussed on a media platform owned by the world’s richest man. Without delving into Alex Jones’ career history in more depth, his Sandy Hook misstep must be placed in the correct historical context for the reader. Alex Jones’ political ideas have been a mixture of Christian conservatism and libertarianism, making him suspicious of federal agencies, those in power, and influential “philanthropists”. He was a fervent critic of both Bush and Obama, as well as a strong supporter of Trump. In 2013, he appeared in the media, alongside many other American conservatives like orthodox Jew Ben Shapiro, to defend the Second Amendment of the Constitution, i.e. the right of law-abiding citizens to bear arms as a protection against a government that could turn into a tyranny (he had on this a famous debate with Piers Morgan on CNN in 2013).
Initially, he began to suspect that the Sandy Hook school shooting involved government and media cover-ups and that federal agencies had been involved in an attempt to strip Americans of their right to bear arms. In 2014-2015, he took these initial suspicions even further and claimed that the entire school shooting may have been a staged event in which no children had died, and that the parents appearing on TV were crisis actors. It is important to understand that Alex Jones himself did not invent these theories, as at that time they were widespread in many YouTube videos, often with millions of views. As “evidence” of alleged inconsistencies, a CNN video clip, for example, was used, in which one of the parents of Sandy Hook victims appeared to be laughing and then suddenly became serious when cameras went on.
Conspiracy theories often consist of such individual peculiarities, which are then used to build a larger conspiracy narrative without first considering alternative explanations, such as why a grieving parent who has lost a child might laugh before appearing in front of TV cameras. But the essence of the matter now is that these Sandy Hook theories promoted by Alex Jones in 2014-2015 were not scrutinized until 2018, when he had already been censored on all major social media platforms. From 2010 to 2015, he was often invited to speak on mainstream media news platforms, not as a respected guest, but as a clown who no one should take seriously. So, the mainstream media itself wanted to give him more visibility for entertainment and comedy purposes (he has always been a somewhat comical figure in a positive sense).
During that time, journalists showed little interest in the feelings of the Sandy Hook families when Alex Jones was seen as nothing more than a tin-foil-hat-wearing clown. Their “conscience” strangely awakened only five years after the school shooting. Why? Because Alex Jones and his Infowars media team played a significant role in the 2016 presidential elections that led to Donald Trump’s victory. Therefore, Sandy Hook served as a convenient way to tarnish Jones’ reputation, even though he had not spoken about it for a couple of years, and from 2017 to 2018, he admitted his mistake and apologized to the parents of the victims for his error. He personally sent a video message to the parents, asking for forgiveness and expressing his desire for dialogue and peace with them (Jones has repeated his apology hundreds of times since then whenever he has been asked about it).
But it was only after this that the persecution against him by journalists escalated. News headlines often falsely claimed that he still denied the school shootings, slandered parents, and encouraged his listeners to harass grieving families or even urinate on the graves of deceased children. Thus the real Sandy Hook hoax was not that no child died in the school shooting, but rather that Alex Jones denied it several years later and encouraged his listeners to harass the parents. After being censored on major social media platforms, he had very few opportunities to defend himself against these accusations, and that is why many took it at face value that Alex Jones was still purposefully lying about the Sandy Hook, as even Musk seemed to believe a year ago.
Jones’s removal from major internet platforms had nothing to do with Sandy Hook. It was a result of CNN journalists’ lobbying campaign against their competitor Infowars and its founder because Jones’s pro-Trump reporting resonated better with the American people than CNN’s anti-Trump reporting. On X December 10, YouTube media personality Mark Dice posted the following tweet:
As the media flips out over@ElonMusk restoring Alex Jones account (@RealAlexJones), it’s important to point out to everyone the REAL reason Alex was banned from Twitter in the first place back in 2018. And contrary to popular belief it was NOT because he entertained some conspiracy theories about Sandy Hook, as crazy as they were. Twitter specifically cited the Oliver Darcy confrontation, who is a public figure (working for CNN), which took place on public property, while Darcy was working in the capacity of a reporter at the time, outside a congressional hearing about censorship on social media. They claimed it was “harassment” because he told him off for working to get him banned off all the other platforms. The irony is too thick to even describe.
Twitter held out after he was unpersoned by YouTube and Facebook, but then after he humiliated the CNN clown, that was cited as the reason for the ban by Twitter’s Trust and Safety account. People should watch Tucker Carlson’s interview with Alex Jones to see the real Alex, not just his flaws and mistakes that the media spent years amplifying and trying to make his identity. He is a genius, but like most geniuses, it’s counterbalanced by equal sized flaws. But he was banned for bogus reasons in order to silence him, not because of a whacky conspiracy theory from years earlier he entertained, but because when he’s firing on all cylinders and on point, he’s a wrecking ball to the corrupt political establishment and was revealing too much about how the power structures work. Period.
Elon Musk responded to Mark Dice’s post: “Accurate.” The restoration of Alex Jones’ account followed the Tucker Carlson interview on X. Tucker Carlson is a former popular host of Fox News, who was fired by his former employer and moved to X, owned by Elon Musk, where his interviews have been the most-watched in history of television. Although the numbers do not indicate how many minutes the programs have been watched, X’s viewer statistics have shown that his interview with Trump had over 200 million views, and his interview with the newly elected conservative president of Argentina, Javier Milei, had over 400 million views. Tucker’s interview with Alex Jones did not quite reach these numbers, but it triggered a series of events that led Musk to organize a “referendum” on whether Jones’ account should be restored to the platform. Approximately 70% of the voters responded positively, resulting in the restoration of Alex Jones’ account on X.
Alex Jones’s Surreal Discussion with Elon Musk
The censorship of Alex Jones on the internet was the first domino, and a test field that made it easier for major technology companies to also start censoring more moderate conservative or media-critical voices, and ultimately President Donald Trump in the aftermath of the events of January 6th. I had already warned about this in my blog at the time, stating that it was a significant blow against the foundations of free speech and that it would not be limited to just Alex Jones. Elon Musk not only restored Jones’ X-account but also personally engaged in a conversation with him and other public figures on the X discussion forum, where multiple participants can join in simultaneously (Musk said that in the future, these X-spaces would be upgraded to video conversations instead of the current audio-only discussions).
The conversation with Jones and Musk also involved a diverse group, including the 38-year-old articulate populist Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy, Laura Loomer, a Jewish supporter of Trump, and Andrew Tate and his brother Tristan from Romania. The two mentioned earlier are quite controversial figures even among conservatives (Andrew, who has converted to Islam, is a Hamas appeaser who has made a fortune through his female employees onlyfans porn business). However, his overall message resonates with many young male listeners because it offers a counter-narrative to our hyper-feminist era, which tells young men that taking responsibility for their own lives and strive to success is toxic masculinity.
Although Andrew Tate is a friend of Alex Jones, Jones himself is not a sympathizer of Hamas or anti-Israel. While browsing through Jones’ old tweets, I came across a video from August 2018 where he warns his listeners about George Soros’ anti-Israel projects. Similarly, Musk himself has recently strongly supported Israel and the Netanyahu government against Hamas and left-wing anti-Semitism. At the end of his recent trip to Israel, he hung a pendant given to him by the families of the victims of the October 7th terrorist attack and vowed not to remove it until all the hostages were brought home.
To be honest, I’m not an active follower of Alex Jones, although I have known about his career for about 20 years. I follow many other social media influencers who are considered less controversial. However, I have often appreciated Alex Jones’ perspectives, even if I may not agree with everything. I have also marveled at his vast knowledge on various topics. Jones’ ability to accurately predict the future is sometimes eerily accurate and far-sighted. He predicted months ahead of time that Islamist terrorists would attack the Twin Towers in New York with airplanes, for which the U.S. government would blame Osama Bin Laden. In September-December 2021, he correctly predicted that Putin would invade Ukraine in February 2022. He also predicted Covid-19 and the government measures associated with it years before the pandemic broke out.
Alex Jones also brings up topics that many other conservative media personalities are hesitant to discuss. In an interview with Tucker Carlson, which Elon Musk watched, he brought up the plans of the globalist elites, which are bringing the prophecies of the Book of Revelation literally to fruition. He spoke about a cashless society, the mark of the beast, and holograms that everyone must worship in order to become citizens of this new brave world. He said he believes that the Book of Revelation was written as a warning about a future that we could avoid (although I personally do not share this perspective). I don’t think anyone – no matter how influential or wealthy – can prevent the future that God has written in advance in His Word. Neither Trump nor Musk can change it.
Comments against a global government of influential men like Trump or Musk only show that an increasing number of people in the world are starting to wake up to the literal realization of the visions in the Book of Revelation, even if they don’t believe in the Book of Revelation itself. As Tucker Carlson said to Alex Jones, “I am a Christian myself, but I don’t think you have to be to come to the same conclusion.” In the discussion on the end-time events, the voices of individuals like Alex Jones and Elon Musk are an interesting addition because they offer us more than just a sense of doom and escapism, which you may commonly hear in the more traditional pre-tribulational pre-millennialism.
Pessimistic versus optimistic vision of the future
I don’t mean to imply that the anticipation of Jesus’ coming is not important, and that we should not be ready on the day of His coming. But often we may forget that the church will return to rule this planet at the end of the 7-year period of Antichrist. The teaching about the end times, focused on the rapture and the time of tribulation, is often very pessimistic in nature when it comes to this world. It doesn’t offer much positive insight on how we can positively impact the future, what kind of future we should strive for, or what future vision would inspire us to fight for the preservation of this world.
Pre-tribulationist pre-millennialism does acknowledge that Jesus’ coming does not mean the end of the world (in the literal sense of the word), but rather the beginning of a new “golden age.” However, it also includes an unspoken assumption that Jesus himself will build this new and better civilization while His servants passively watch from the sidelines. However, the Bible teaches that we, as Christians, are the kingdom and priesthood of God who will reign on earth1 and that we represent that kingdom on earth even today.2 How can the church rule on earth if it doesn’t even care about the kind of world it will inherit or the future it should fight for in this age?
It is impossible to build the future on a foundation of cynicism or pessimistic future scenarios. Otherwise, the church would return to earth as a grumbling crowd, frustrated about having to leave the heavenly glory and return to earthly misery (who would even want to return to earth in such case where the future is so dark and hopeless?). This problem would not exist if the church adopts a positive, optimistic, and progressive vision of the future, in a long term, a future that we can also influence through our own choices. In this sense, I agree with Elon Musk’s ideas that as individuals and as the human race we should create a shared vision of the kind of future we want to build for ourselves and future generations. For Musk his vision of a multiplanetary civilization focused on space travel is the most inspiring model that gives him a reason to rise for a new day.
Life cannot be just a series of solving depressing problems one after another. There must also be something that inspires you, something that makes you happy when you wake up knowing that you are part of humanity.
How many of us can say that we resonate with these feelings when we wake up in the morning? Probably not many. This is also due to the fact that we have lost our biblical understanding of ourselves and our role in the universe created by God. We have lost a common vision and a common goal. Even Christians themselves do not always understand that God created us in His image to explore, create, conquer, and embrace our rightful place in the creation as the crown of the creation and co-rulers with God. An optimistic vision of the future does not necessarily have to be a civilization focused on conquest of space as Elon Musk sees it. It can be one part of that vision.
But it is essentially a belief in humanity, in the idea that both as individuals and as a human race as a whole, we can contribute something positive to the future. Something that inspires us to do more for a better future, without forgetting the contributions and sacrifices of past generations. Because if our vision of the future is pessimistic, then why bother doing anything at all? If our view of humanity is only negative, then why entrust any responsibility to this wretched human race? Here, I am not advocating for a spiritually empty and hyper-individualistic secular humanism, but rather a humanism guided by Judeo-Christian values and a biblical worldview from which it originated. Its antithesis is what I call satanic anti-humanism, which is increasingly gaining ground in our post-Christian society. Quoting Alex Jones and Elon Musk’s dialogue, which at times delved into profound philosophical questions.
- Alex: Elon, I knew you were doing a great job when I saw you six months ago at the World Government Summit, where they all said we want to microchip people… we want to build the Tower of Babel… they want to create an artificially created Great Reset, to collapse the economies to impoverish everyone else, and they’ll consolidate their power… We have to talk about interstellar civilization, we have to expand or we’re going to have a collapse. And Elon Musk says – correct me if I’m wrong – that we’re not going to survive here stagnant, we’re either going to expand or we’re going to collapse.
- Elon: Yes, either grow or collapse. A stable state is essentially impossible, so we must choose one, whether we want to grow our civilization or regress and collapse. Because a stable state is not stable, and I personally propose that we grow and expand. We have more people, and we become a diverse species and a space-exploring civilization, and eventually we are out there in outer space among the stars, and I think that is an exciting and inspiring future, not a regressing human civilization that amounts to nothing and where humanity dies whimpering.
Expanding Humanism versus Declining Antihumanism
This theme of “expansionist humanism” versus “regressive antihumanism” runs throughout the two-hour discussion. Alex Jones, Elon Musk, and Andrew Tate put humanists who value freedom and humanity and progress against globalists who prioritize tyranny and self-interest, with no regard for the well-being of humanity as a whole. Andrew Tate succinctly summarizes the opposing forces and ideologies at play: “I don’t think most people understand that it’s simply a humanistic perspective versus a death cult. The former has no interest in promoting the interests of the human species as a whole. They are only interested in power and control, and they seek absolute power over people. We can talk about all the perverse reasons why they do this, but all those people at home who don’t understand the seriousness of this battle, they seem to believe it’s some kind of right-wing versus left-wing thing.”
Elon Musk adds, “Exactly, this right-left categorization is the wrong way to look at things. It’s more about those driving the extinction of the human species versus those defending humanity. And once you see this, it becomes very clear to everyone.” Alex Jones refers to this pro-human philosophy as “human supremacy”, as opposed to white supremacy, black supremacy, or any racially divisive ideology that divides humanity based on skin color. It is also opposed to the antihumanism promoted by the global elite or “human racism,” which views human freedom and flourishing in the natural world (such as having children) as evil and seeks to reduce the world’s population to 500 million (as stated in the Georgia Guidestones’ “Ten Commandments” for the new age).
Is Musk a Transhumanist?
Musk has been described as a post- or transhumanist, by promoting the idea of merging human and machine through his company Neuralink’s brain chips. This has raised concerns among many conservatives and skepticism about his true motives. However, Alex Jones, who extensively covered transhumanism in his documentary film Endgame back in 2007, offers the following balanced counter-argument to this concern:
My uncle was in a motorcycle accident and received an experimental brain chip five years ago. Now he can speak and walk. So, I’m not against brain chips when they are necessary. I don’t believe they should be given to schoolchildren or sold at the consumer level, but I’m also a libertarian who believes that if you want a brain chip, you should be able to get one.
That’s why I tell people who get nervous about Elon Musk being involved in every advanced technology that globalists are developing. Technology is like a gun, it depends on whose hands it’s in, and that’s why we need to put that gun in the hands of the people. A “gun of expansion” instead of being in the hands of globalists, and just because Elon Musk is at the forefront of every cutting-edge technology… Don’t be afraid of technology like some people are, as long as we control it. Elon says we need expanding human growth, competition, and freedom, not a new dark age where we disconnect from civilization.
This is in line with my own views, which I expressed in my blog 3-4 years ago. Technology itself is not some mark of the beast that we should fear. Instead, it is completely legitimate to fear the brain implants promoted by Klaus Schwab. In the wrong hands, technology is dangerous, just like a nuclear bomb is dangerous in the hands of terrorists. But in the right hands, it can also be a salvation for many. If the natural direction of technological development leads us, for example, to some kind of fusion between human and computer (as the current direction has already led us), then I wouldn’t consider that something we should automatically reject or fear.
The challenge for humanity itself is to ensure the safety of new technologies and their ethical use. So, the ultimate question here is: do we use new technology to maximize individual freedom, opportunities, and well-being, guided by Judeo-Christian ethics, or do we use it to maximize the abuse of power by totalitarian governments or large corporations without any moral guidelines? For example, artificial intelligence is not a dangerous invention in itself, but in the hands of criminals, it is a very dangerous tool.
I have long respected Elon Musk even before he started aligning himself with conservative and Christian influencers or publicly defending the state of Israel against the media and the left’s fueled antisemitism. I saw a lot of similarity between him and Donald Trump, as both men challenged the interests of those in power and established paradigms. Musk in the business world and Trump in politics. When advertising firms started boycotting Musk’s X recently due to his politically incorrect views and defense of free speech, he said in an interview with The New York Times: “If anyone thinks they can blackmail me with ad revenue, blackmail me with money… Go f-ck yourself. Seriously, go f-ck yourself!”
Endless resources or limited resources?
If we think about Musk’s perhaps somewhat utopian future visions of a humanity expanding into the stars, or a multiplanetary civilization, its main idea lies in the goal itself, not whether it will ever come true. Humanity must have some positive, growth-oriented existential goal, or else it will move towards decline and collapse. We have already conquered most of the Earth, so space is our next natural frontier. It is also a rejection of Malthusian anti-humanists who seek to control every aspect of our lives, under the pretext that Earth’s natural resources are limited and should be regulated by some form of global governance.
The limited resources of Earth pose a threat to us only if we stifle people’s freedom to innovate and produce new ideas for finding new resources. But this is exactly what the globalist elite aims for, as they see freedom itself as the greatest threat to their power. Musk’s vision of expanding civilization to other planets is not to the liking of these control freaks precisely because it would demonstrate that the world’s natural resources are practically limitless and that humans have the ability to search for and find them even beyond our own planet. Since space exploration is technically so challenging, it forces bright minded people to seek innovative solutions to difficult problems, leading to new inventions that benefit also those living on Earth.
Therefore, space travel should not be seen as an escapist attempt to escape the problems of our own planet by going to outer space. A colony on Mars would also help those who live on Earth because it would lead to countless new innovations that benefit humanity even before it becomes possible to bring it to fruition. And Musk’s bold visions for future could only be realized in a society that values freedom and freedom of speech; which listens to different perspectives and opinions, even if mainstream paradigms brand them as entirely crazy. Alex Jones is a prime example of how rejecting our prejudices can often lead to great enlightenment and groundbreaking insights that revolutionize society. As ChatGPT said about the hypothetical discussion between Elon Musk and Alex Jones (hypothetical because it doesn’t have knowledge on more current events): “It serves as a reminder that in the realm of ideas, even the most unexpected encounters can lead to fascinating discussions. It’s through exchanges like these that new ideas are born, and existing concepts are challenged, ultimately contributing to the ever-evolving landscape of knowledge and understanding.” I conclude my article with one of Alex Jones’ most significant scientific discovery:
I don’t like ’em putting chemicals in the water that turn the frickin’ frogs gay.
NOTE: THIS ALEX’S FAMOUS SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERY WAS ALSO PUBLISHED IN THE REPUTABLE SCIENCE JOURNAL NATURE.
Author & blogger Samuel Tuominen’s archives 
Leave a comment