ORIGINAL BLOG POST PUBLISHED IN FINNISH ON AUGUST 2, 2020

READING TIME: 19 MINUTES

In May, I published an article entitled Prince Charles will lead a meeting of world political and economic leaders in June in an attempt to create a new post-pandemic economic world order. Like many other shocking events outside the mainstream news, the event received little coverage in the international media. But a few conservative voices have begun to wake up to this diabolical plan, and Glenn Beck , a former host on Fox News, recently warned America about it on his BlazeTV YouTube channel. Although a new world order has been in the making behind the scenes for decades (or even centuries, some may claim), these projects got a wind in their sails this year when the coronavirus that spread from Wuhan in China earlier this year turned into a global pandemic. Whether or not the virus was deliberately created or not, the end result seems to have helped the cause of those who use any international crisis as an excuse to dismantle the current capitalist world order. The plan was in place well before the global pandemic was declared by the World Health Organisation (WHO) in March.

---

As I reported in my blog at the beginning of the year, in January Prince Charles gave the keynote speech at the 50th anniversary of the World Economic Forum in Davos, where he travelled for the first time in more than 30 years. Speaking there under the conspicuous 666 symbol of stylized Prince of Wales” feathers, he called on world’s economic and political leaders to take the first steps to “change the paradigm that inspires action at a revolutionary level and pace”. He called for this revolutionary action not to stop a pandemic, that wasn’t yet declared, but the climate change. President Trump also spoke at the 50th anniversary of the Davos’s globalist meeting and in his speech he lashed climate alarmists like Charles: “But to embrace the possibilities of tomorrow, we must reject the eternal prophets of doom and their prophecies of apocalypse… These alarmists always demand the same thing; extreme power to rule, change and control every aspect of our lives. We will never allow radical socialists to destroy our economy and destroy our country.” Interestingly, according to press reports, Charles understood that Trump was referring to him, and others like him, but he did not deny that their goal was exactly what Trump claimed in his speech.

While the pandemic-induced closure of nations’ borders and economies around the world initially looked like a death blow to the open-border globalism that Hillary Clinton represented in the 2016 presidential election and for which red-green parties have championed across the West in recent years, the globalist elite saved its already doomed vision of the future by harnessing the pandemic to the cause of globalism. Instead of sending a message about the problems of unrestricted immigration and open-border globalism that reinforced the message of right-wing nationalist populists, the pandemic was now a global, transnational problem that required greater intergovernmental cooperation and interdependence to overcome. In other words, a global governance, whose authority should transcend the ‘narrow and short-sighted interests’ of nation states. On Earth Day on 1 July, 50 years after Earth Day was first celebrated, the Prince of Wales made the following startling statement:

‘As we reflect on the 50th anniversary of Earth Day, I have long believed that people often will not act until there is a crisis. ‘The challenge I have found with climate change and biodiversity loss is that the danger often feels all too distant. The coronavirus, by contrast, has shown us the true nature of a global emergency along with the drastic measures we must take and the urgency with which we must act. ‘It has also shown us that it is indeed possible to find and scale up global solutions when we agree on a higher, common purpose.  Despite the challenges, we are also seeing the very best of the human spirit, ingenuity and collaboration as we reflect on what we value most. The parallels between the human and the planetary condition in the coronavirus are quite clear. If we look at the planet as if it were a patient, we can see that our activities have been damaging her immune system and she has been struggling to breathe and thrive due to the strain we have put on her vital organs… ‘To reflect and inspire the world to action, while aiming for a green recovery, I would ask you to join me by sharing your vision for a more sustainable future (socially, environmentally and economically) using the hashtag #ReimagineReset. Together, I am confident that we can use this crisis to reset our course by putting people and planet first.’

Prince Charles speaks here like some kind of Donald Trump’s globalist doppelganger, preaching “Planet First” instead of “America First”. His metaphor of the planet as a terminally ill patient is also very alarming. It was common in Nazi propaganda to equate the nation with a living organism and the people with the cells of that organism. The purpose of the analogy was to justify the killing of “cells” that weakened this body of the state or “viruses” that invaded this body – namely the Jews. Hitler, in fact, saw himself as a benevolent doctor who would cure a dying patient by first removing the deadly virus that had caused her illness. He once said, “The discovery of the Jewish virus is one of the greatest revolutions that has ever taken place in the world.” In their 1920 book The Permission to Destroy Life Unworthy of Life, German professors Karl Binding and Alfred Hoche advocated euthanasia or state killing. They described the state as “an organism with its own laws and rights, somewhat like a self-sufficient human organism”, which “in the interest of the welfare of the whole – as we doctors know – discards parts or particles that have become worthless or dangerous.” Richard A. Koenigsberg writes in his paper Nationalism, Nazism-Genocide:

 The Final Solution represented the enactment of an immunological fantasy. According to this Nazi fantasy, genocide represented the “automatic” response of the German body politic to a “law of nature:” the national organism reacting to reject or destroy those alien cells (e. g., Jewish bacteria) that had entered its bloodstream. The Final Solution and death camps, then, may be understood as a response to the fantasy that Jews constituted bacteria or viruses that needed to be removed from the German body politic if the nation was to survive. One Nazi doctor stated that National Socialism was “nothing but applied biology.” Lifton suggests that this image of Nazism was not just one doctor’s perception, but was the “vision put forward by the movement.” The unifying principle of the biomedical ideology, Lifton concludes, was “that of a deadly racial disease, the sickness of the Aryan race: the cure, the killing of all Jews.”

So when Prince Charles compares our planet to a sick patient, the purpose of the analogy is to justify the destruction of the harmful virus or tumour that is causing the death of this patient – in this case, the entire human race (or those who “overpopulate” it)- for the “benefit of the whole”. This ideology, which places the rights and interests of the collective above those of the individual, has led to atrocities throughout the world, under both fascism and communism. Evolutionary biologist Julian Huxley, brother of Aldous Huxley, author of Brave New World , who co-founded the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) with Prince Philip, once said, “Mankind will be the cancer of the planet.” Philip himself lamented in the 1980s how human population growth had reached “proportions of plague” and said he hoped for a reincarnation as a deadly virus in response to the “problem” of overpopulation.

Charles also wrote in his book Harmony, “We cannot achieve balance unless we seriously begin to address how to stabilize and even reduce the human population of the world… this of course raises difficult moral questions… [It is] time to see in a balance the traditional view on the sanctity of life… with the teachings in every sacred tradition that urge humanity to keep within the bounds of nature’s benevolence and generosity.” (pp. 289-290) In other words, Charles does not believe in the sanctity of human life. By juxtaposing the planet with a patient suffering from Covid-19, he aims to paint a picture of himself as a “great healer” on whose shoulders is laid the messianic burden of healing a suffering world broken by our sins. Charles shared this burden with his biographer Catherine Mayer when he told her, ” I only take on the most difficult challenges. Because I want to raise aspirations and create hope from hopelessness and health from deprivation.” In 2003 he preached, “My whole life up to now has been motivated by the desire to heal… that the temple of our humanity might again be illuminated by the holy flame… to heal the mortally wounded soul.” (quote found at the end of a book Radical Prince by David Lorimer who admires Charles).

The Great Reset

The 71-year-old Prince of Wales is not quite as enthusiastic a social media user as President Trump, who is a couple of years older than him. But the Covid-19 crisis, which has taken most of us into quarantine, has forced them to use social media and video messaging more. CBS reported in June, “If a year ago people had told you that Prince Charles would emerge as one of the social media stars of 2020, you would have received derisive looks. But the prince seems to have found his inner hashtag queen and a legion of new fans as a result.” With social media now forming such an integral part of new media and global communication – including the political kind – it is perhaps inevitable that Charles will have to step into a higher profile on social media too if he is to draw the attention of the masses to his political message. It should be remembered that Donald Trump rode to world leadership precisely through his assiduous use of Twitter, which enabled him to bypass the negative and biased news stream of the mainstream media and speak directly to the people. Perhaps Prince Charles will do something very similar.

His social media campaign aims to encourage millions of social media users around the world to join this global climate revolution for a new economic world order. If Lenin or Hitler were alive today, they would be doing exactly what Charles is doing now. The Nazis took full advantage of the new forms of mass media of the time, from popular radio to talk shows, to promote the propaganda of their movement among the masses. Today they would use social media instead of radio and movies. The name of the campaign #ReimagineReset refers to the World Economic Forum’s plan to “reset” the world economy. Justin Haskins, executive director of the Heartland Institute and expert on the Green New Deal presented by young US Democratic politician Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, explains the plan as follows:

It’s not a conspiracy theory. It’s a conspiracy fact.

Before anyone had heard of the Green New Deal – the radical proposal to eliminate fossil fuels in 10 years and impose a series of socialist programs on the US economy – I vividly remember talking to a friend, an expert on renewable energy sources like wind and solar, natural gas and other forms of energy, about the prospect of the GND becoming law.

“This is ridiculous,” he told me. “We shouldn’t spend any time talking about this in public. None of what they are calling for is actually achievable. It’s impossible. There’s no way anyone is going to take this seriously.”

My friend was wrong. The world really took it quite seriously. Very seriously, in fact. Most of the Democratic Party power elite campaigned around the idea. Hundreds of left-wing leaders supported it. Numerous environmental organizations and other groups said it was necessary. Leading presidential candidates like Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris, and others said that unless we impose a Green New Deal – or something like it – life on Earth will be in danger of being destroyed. It’s “an existential threat,” they said.

CNN even devoted hours of programming time to its “Climate Change Town Hall,” during which several Democratic candidates endorsed some form of GND.

In the wake of these remarkable claims, those of us who support the free market economy and individual freedom launched a massive campaign to stop the GND. I wrote countless articles, gave speeches at conferences, spoke to several leaders of the free market movement, including media personalities like Glenn Beck, and appeared on television and radio more than 12 times – including a few appearances on Tucker Carlson Tonight – to warn people about GND and its kin.

Our efforts bore fruit. Thanks to the work of literally thousands of conservatives and libertarians, the Green New Deal died in Congress, the presidential candidates supporting the GND failed to win the Democratic Party nomination – proof that public support for the plan had eroded. (Joe Biden has his own terrible climate plan, of course, but it’s not as socialist or radical as the Green New Deal.)

But in the wake of the interest rate pandemic and the resulting massive growth of government power, leftist leaders have been advocating a new idea, one that is even more overtly socialist than the Green New Deal, and more dangerous because of its global nature. It’s called “The Great Reset,” and while it hasn’t yet received significant media attention outside of a few mainstream media outlets, it will soon, and when it does, the only hope of stopping it will be another major campaign to bring together freedom supporters across the US and the world.

In short, the Great Reset is a proposal that would completely transform the entire global economy, moving it closer to collectivism and away from capitalism. According to its most ardent supporters, the goal of the “Great Reset” is threefold: (1) to repair the damage done to the global economy by the corona crisis; (2) to stop the climate change disaster; and (3) to use the two aforementioned “crises” as an opportunity to promote socialist ideals, including the destruction of capitalism and individual rights.

While there have been some brief hints that suggest world leaders have been preparing a Great Reset plan over the past months, the plan was first unveiled at a recent virtual World Economic Forum meeting, where global leaders from the United Nations, the United Kingdom, the United States, the International Monetary Fund and multinational corporations discussed and announced the “Great Reset” proposal.

“We have a golden opportunity to take something good from this [COVID-19] crisis. Its unprecedented shockwaves can make people much more receptive to the grand visions of change,” said Prince Charles, one of the event’s leaders and a major proponent of the Great Reset.

In an article published on the World Economic Forum’s website, Forum founder and CEO Klaus Schwab said that “the world must act collectively and quickly to revitalise all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working conditions.

“Every nation from the United States to China must get involved, and every industry, from oil, gas and technology companies must change,” Schwab added. “In short, we need the ‘great reset’ of capitalism.”

Haskins concludes with a grim warning: ‘The Great Reset represents the most significant threat to capitalism and individual freedom in more than half a century. In many ways it is far more dangerous than the Soviet Union ever was, because so many people in countries like the UK and the US support the Great Reset in ways we never saw during the Cold War. Defenders of freedom must not laugh at the Great Reset as a pipe dream. Some of the most powerful people and institutions in the world already support it (Microsoft, IMF, World Economic Forum, United Nations, etc.) and we are still in the early stages of the plan. After the right moment for the Great Reset builds, it will be time to start ringing the alarm bell. We cannot afford to wait.” Prince Charles is thus leading a campaign that, according to Haskins, represents “a far more dangerous threat than the Soviet Union ever posed”. Perhaps many conservatives and Christians will now begin to see Charles in a very different light from the one they have seen him in so far. When I informed a New Zealand correspondent of this campaign in May, he replied to me: “Samuel, when you sent me these two links that I didn’t know about, I nearly fell off my chair in complete shock. This is on top of the mountain of all the other material we already know that shows Prince Charles to be the Bible’s prophesied ‘Antichrist’.”

Joe Biden’s connection

In a July 23 opinion piece on Fox Business , Haskins explains how Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden’s Build Back Better plan to revive the economy from the damage of Covid-19 is borrowed directly from this “Great Reset” agenda led by Prince Charles and the World Economic Forum. Haskins writes: “While it has not received widespread attention, the Great Reset is perhaps the greatest threat to capitalism and individual freedoms since the collapse of the Soviet Union… [Klaus] Schwab, the World Economic Forum and international figures like Prince Charles are currently leading the campaign for the Great Reset… The connection between Biden and the radical Great Reset is best seen by observing Biden’s ‘Build Back Better’ plan. According to Biden’s website, his Build Back Better proposal “would launch a national effort to create the jobs we need to build modern, sustainable infrastructure now, and help create a just clean energy future.” The focus of Biden’s proposal is on the destruction of the modern energy industry, which Biden wants to replace with ‘renewable’ energy sources like wind and solar power.”

Haskins continues, “Biden’s plan calls for converting the entire power grid to ‘green’ sources by only 2035, a wildly unrealistic goal that would have a devastating impact on the economy… The Build Back Better plan comes straight out of the Great Reset playbook. Supporters of the Great Reset, notably the World Economic Forum, have for years called the ‘Build Back Better’ plan some variation of the plan, often using those specific words in World Economic Forum materials. In fact, as recently as July 13, the World Economic Forum promoted ‘Build Back Better’ through ‘green’ infrastructure programs as part of the Great Reset in an article entitled ‘To Build Back Better, We Must Reinvent Capitalism. Here’s how we do it.’” Haskins also notes:

“Supporters of the Great Reset have tried to promote their proposal as a new form of capitalism, but the truth is that it is essentially a socialist system, because it would put under collective control most economic activity and impose a series of social justice reforms designed to ‘rebalance economies’ and redistribute wealth around the world. Supporters of the Great Reset use the word ‘capitalism’ just to make it sound more appealing to people in America and elsewhere who know that socialism has failed spectacularly in the past.”

Conclusion

While I don’t think Joe Biden will win the November presidential electio [update from August 2023, I still don’t think that Biden won the 2020 election] – based on Kim Clement’s prophecies about Donald Trump’s second term, and some other factors (including Biden’s budding dementia, his lack of charisma and unpopularity among the younger and more radical demographic in the Democratic Party, Tara Reade’s allegations of Biden’s history of sexual harassment, and the Democratic Party’s support for the Black Lives Matter and Antifa anarchists who burn American cities and desecrate the country’s founding fathers) – his association with this global campaign led by Prince Charles to destroy the old capitalist world order is yet another good example of the British Royal Family’s, and especially its current heir apparent, political influence behind-the-scenes, of which the vast majority of people are completely unaware. I have been arguing for years that in the 2016 election, Hillary Clinton was a candidate put forward by the globalist elite, whose aims ultimately served the interests of George Soros, the Rothschild banking family and the Saxe-Coburg Goth aristocratic family, more commonly known as the British Royal Family.

For example, I wrote on my blog recently about how electronic correspondence released by Wikileaks shows that Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign received instructions and financial advice directly from Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild, who described herself in those emails as Hillary’s “biggest fan” and “loyal admirer”. Her husband, Evelyn de Rothschild, is a financial adviser to Elizabeth II who played polo in his youth against the Queen’s husband, Prince Philip. Lady Lynn de Rothschild, who spent her wedding night at the White House at the invitation of Bill and Hillary Clinton in 2000, was also a good friend of paedophile Jeffrey Epstein and his girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell. According to one of Epstein’s victims, the whole paedophile and blackmail ring was an operation led by the Rothschild banking dynasty to blackmail world leaders into dancing to the tune of the globalist elite (see: according to Jeffrey Epstein’s victim, the newly arrested Epstein “right-hand woman” Ghislaine Maxwell worked for the Rothschild banking family, who in turn work for Elizabeth II and are close allies of the Clintons).

Wikipedia says of Lady Lynn Forester, “Rothschild co-chaired/founded the day-long Inclusive Capitalism Conference in London on 27 May 2014, in an effort to make the capitalist system work for more people, which included an opening address by Prince Charles and a guest address by Bill Clinton. The second conference was held in London on 26 June 2015.” Conservative radio personality Rush Limbaugh, who received a Medal of Honor earlier this year from President Trump during his February State of the Union address , noted Prince Charles’ speech at that time at that conference on inclusive capitalism and said about it, “You see, in a nutshell, Prince Charles is calling for the end of capitalism as we know it in an attempt to save the planet from global warming. What he’s trying to say here – although he doesn’t say it directly – is that he believes capitalism will destroy the world.”

A few years earlier, in a speech in the EU Parliament, Charles mocked those who believe he and others are part of a conspiracy to destroy the capitalist world order: “Their assumption that hundreds of scientists around the world and those who accept their dispassionate evidence – including myself, who somewhat ironically have been constantly accused of being anti-science – are somehow unconsciously biased, creating the impression that many of us are somehow conspiring to undermine and deliberately destroy the entire market-based capitalist system that now rules the world.” In other words, those who oppose our plans are tinfoil hats nutjobs in their delusions, and should not be taken seriously by anyone. However, the Prince’s recent actions confirm that he, along with other Davos globalists, is indeed conspiring to undermine and deliberately destroy the entire market-based capitalist system that now rules the world.