Although I set up my blog to follow the potential prophetic role of the British royal family and King Charles III, I have also been following US politics closely because the US president still has such global influence on world events. I jumped on the “Trump train” early on, so I’ll do a little retrospective on what I originally thought of Trump’s presidential role in the eschatological timeline, or what I’ve predicted about his career over the years. I have never claimed to be a prophet, nor do I base my predictions about the future on personal visions, dreams or prophecies.
My predictions have been purely speculative, based on my understanding of past or current events, which I have tried to fit into a broader historical or prophetic context, which I form by studying history, politics and end-time biblical prophecy. I have also promoted the prophetic visions of other Christians because I believe in the gift of prophecy, and I especially trust prophecies that have already been fulfilled in the past. Have I then also promoted false prophecies on my blog? Sure. Have I myself made wrong predictions about future events? Sure. Have I erred in my interpretation of Bible prophecies and drawn wrong conclusions from them? And whenever I have realized that I have been wrong in predictions, I have publicly apologized that to my readers. In fact, I have apologized in advance for my entire ministry in case I was wrong from the start.
Content
- On right and wrong prophecies
- Donald Trump and Cyrus the Great
- Defeatism versus triumphalism
- What did I predict correctly?
- What did I predict about Charles’s role?
- What did I predict about Trump’s Middle East policy?
- Did I predict the global Covid-19 pandemic ahead of time?
- Did I predict Trump’s assassination attempt?
- What did I predict about Trump’s second term?
- Conclusion
On right and wrong prophecies
When it comes to studying Bible prophecy or the personal prophecies received by Christians, it is worth remembering Paul’s words here:
Love never fails; but if there are gifts of prophecy, they will be done away; if there are tongues, they will cease; if there is knowledge, it will be done away. For we know in part and we prophesy in part; but when the perfect comes, the partial will be done away.”1
Does this mean that God can also give us false prophecies? Of course not. But all knowledge, understanding and prophecy that comes through man is always to some extent obscured by our fallen mind. That is why I think it is dangerous to start relying too much on any one prophet, teacher or student of the God’s Word. We must not make any man God, for God alone knows all things. For example, when after Trump’s assassination attempt I learned that a Christian named Brandon Biggs had predicted back in March that Trump would be shot in the ear, which he will survive with a scare thanks to the guardian angels sent by God, I consider it an example of prophecy fulfilled. But I don’t automatically assume that Brandon is correct in all his other prophecies (this video suggests that the man in question has also made false prophecies in the past that did not come true).
Can a true prophet also give false prophecies? And can a false prophet also give true prophecies? That is an interesting question to ponder. Perhaps it would be more important to be careful not to exalt people too much with the titles of “prophet” or “teacher”, because – as Jesus said – “one is your teacher, and you are all brothers.”2 Indeed, my own view has been that the purpose of prophecies is not that we should begin to look at people through them and exalt people, but that God alone should receive the glory of fulfilled prophecies and people should believe in His name through them. A Christian sister told me that her non-believing son, who was usually scornful or sceptical about such things, was impressed by Brandon’s spot-on prophecy.
If anyone comes to faith because of the prophecy received by Brandon Biggs, praise the Lord. However, I would not encourage anyone to make him a personal guru on whose prophecies we should base all our life choices and expectations about the future. A Christian endowed with the gift of both prophesying and teaching should remember to always maintain humility and introspection in how he or she exercises this gift. Just as the teacher of the Word has a responsibility before his hearers and before God in what he teaches, so the prophet has a responsibility in what he prophesies in the name of his Lord. Paul again gives a balanced instruction on this:
Do not utterly reject prophecies, but examine everything; hold firmly to that which is good.3
Just as we should not despise the gift of teaching, neither should we despise the gift of prophecy. But as foolish as it would be to follow the word of a teacher without first testing his teaching, so also the word of a prophet should not be followed without testing it. Or as foolish as it would be to believe a teacher is 100% infallible in everything he teaches, so likewise we should not expect a so-called prophet to always be 100% correct in his prophecies. However, prophets have a great responsibility for what they speak in the name of God, because already under the Old Covenant “prophets” who spoke falsely in the name of God had to be stoned to death.4 Although later Jesus lamented that Israel also stoned the true prophets under the guise of this law.5
But Christians must not follow in the footsteps of Muslims and create new religions around prophets – or supposed prophets. Christians do not exalt prophets, but God alone. Here again we should remember the words of our Lord: “Many will say to Me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your name, and in Your name cast out demons, and in Your name perform many miracles?’ And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; leave Me, you who practice lawlessness.’6
Donald Trump and Cyrus the Great
Donald Trump-related prophecies are not (or should not be) about Christians making Trump into some sort of demigod messiah figure. But nations and churches need shepherds and leaders; and sometimes God can also raise up leaders who honour His name as heads of nations, even if they are not even outwardly the image of a model Christian. In the same way, He raised up Cyrus the Great as leader of the Persian Empire – even though he did not know the name of the God of Israel – and prophesied it through the prophet Isaiah 150 years before his birth:
It is I who says of Cyrus, ‘He is My shepherd,
And he will carry out all My desire.’
And he says of Jerusalem, ‘She will be built,’
And of the temple, ‘Your foundation will be laid.’”. 7This is what the Lord says to Cyrus His anointed, Whom I have taken by the right hand, To subdue nations before him And to loose the loins of kings; To open doors before him so that gates will not be shut: “I will go before you and make the rough places smooth; I will shatter the doors of bronze and cut through their iron bars. “I will give you the treasures of darkness And hidden wealth of secret places, So that you may know that it is I, The Lord, the God of Israel, who calls you by your name. “For the sake of Jacob My servant, And Israel My chosen one, I have also called you by your name; I have given you a title of honor Though you have not known Me 8
The purpose of this prophecy was not that the Jews would begin to worship Cyrus the Great as “the Lord’s anointed” or “messiah”, but that through Cyrus the Great’s prophecy the Jews would give glory and praise to God alone for their national liberation. In the same way, we can think of God raising up President Trump as a kind of Cyrus the Great figure for the United States of America and the whole world to carry out God’s purposes in these end times before Jesus’ second coming, and announcing his presidency in advance through His prophets like Kim Clement and others, so that people could give glory to God for His mercy and goodness by calling Trump by name even though he did not know His name.
Defeatism versus triumphalism
This idea has sometimes been on a collision course with pre-tribulationist premillenialism, according to which the world would gradually become increasingly more dark and anti-Christian and nothing good should be expected to happen for the Christian church in the end. The church should either wait passively for the pre-tribulation rapture or prepare for the tribulation period and hide out in the countryside with a stockpile of weapons and provisions before the armies of the Antichrist come to slaughter you down to the last member of your family. Thus, neither escapist pre-tribulationism or defeatist and fatalistic post-tribulationism has merged very well with a more optimistic vision of the future regarding those David or Cyrus figures ascending to the leadership of the superpowers, rising up against anti-christian globalism and destroying the corrupt power structures of these powers “to make America great again.”
This latter view has sometimes been criticised as the dominion or kingdom now theology promoted by the ultra-Charismatic movement, which serves as the backbone of politicised Christianity throughout America. Or it may be referred to pejoratively as “Christian nationalism” or “Christian theocracy” by those who believe that Christians should simply submit like sheep to the growing anti-Christian climate in society and not get involved in any way in political decision-making. Personally, I have been waiting for the imminent return of Jesus for at least 20 years and have been disappointed every now and then when the timetable for His coming did not meet my own expectations. Perhaps with these disappointments it was easier for me to take a slightly more optimistic view of my expectations for the end-time and expect Trump to win the election in 2016.
The previous link leads to a blog update I published a few days before the 2016 election, in which I expected Trump to win in light of anticipatory events like Brexit, among other things. In the comments, you will see that I fell out with my then pen pal Olli Rytkönen, who until then had supported my writings about Charles as the most credible anti-Christ candidate in the Bible (our friendship had already begun to crack in private emails before that). Since then Olli started to teach that Trump is the Antichrist and sent me rather hostile letters and comments due to my pro-Trump blogs. I don’t want to bring up these old conflicts because years later we managed to reconcile and mutually apologised.
But I mention the dispute because Olli started to accuse me in his comments of promoting dominion theology when I gave my support to Trump and prophecies about Trump’s victory, such as the prophecies of fireman Mark Taylor and later Kim Clement. Olli commented:
Trump’s election would be a blow to the imminent fulfilment of the end-time prophecies of the Bible in the near future, e.g. the fall of Babylon the Great (Revelation 18), the War of Gog and Magog, and at the same time a blow to the rapture dreams of the Christians… Trump will not restore America to what it was. The wheel of biblical prophecy towards the Antichrist’s kingdom can no longer be stopped and therefore Clinton’s election would be a logical continuation of this development. Besides, it is because of selfish mammon-worshippers, prosperity theologians and ultra-capitalists like Trump that America is facing judgment… These so-called Christian leaders are showing their true colours by supporting him. For example, the Seven Mountains Movement (NAR movement) strongly supports Trump even suggesting that Trump is wearing the mantle of Elijah. Come on!… I say shame on all Christian dominionists like Juha Ahvio. Now let’s measure who has a love for the truth. Fierce deception is rampant!
Olli was very critical of Charismatic movement and I shared most of his views on “American Christianity” when I was younger. But this comment reflects the difference in my and Olli’s thinking. For example, I was never a proponent of Dominion theology, but I understood that it was not in my power to decide when God had ordained America to be judged (in the case that it is the Harlot of Revelation 18 as Olli said). Nor was the timing of the Christian Rapture, the Gog War, or the reign of the Antichrist in my power either. Nor did I see into Trump’s heart, as God sees, to condemn him outright as a “selfish mammon-worshipper” (in fact, many testimonies about him have shown quite the opposite).
Nor did I claim to know all the details of end-time events so well as to exclude the possibility that the rise of the Antichrist could be accompanied by the rise of a more godly Cyrus the Great-like world leader. But I also did not go to the other extreme and start to see Trump as some kind of “nationalist messiah” who would overthrow the power structures of the new world order and even restore our national currency in Finland too, by first destroying the EU. This view was later promoted in the cult-like Q movement, where it was believed that a US secret service agent or group posing as Q was distributing advance information on online forums, formulated into cryptic questions, about the plans Trump was going to use to save the world and destroy the satanic paedophiles ruling the world.
What did I predict correctly?
But I did believe Trump would fulfill, on God’s end-time timetable, some important role whose prophetic significance would become more apparent to Christians as time went on. So at this point it is good to look at what I myself predicted about how events might unfold after Trump’s ascension to power. I wrote to Olli with my thoughts a few days before Trump’s election:
I myself thought at the beginning of [2016] that Trump’s victory would delay the fulfillment of Bible prophecies, but especially after that Brexit in June I have started to think differently… Despite his opposition to New World Order, Trump’s victory might even accelerate the fulfillment of Bible prophecies and I already have quite clear theories about this which I will write about if this happens. In fact, if Hillary Clinton wins, I don’t know if I can find an article worth writing. In a way, it would only mean “Obama’s third term” and would not bring much upheaval to the current international situation. But it is precisely out of great upheavals that counter-upheavals arise, where the forces opposed to nationalism and patriotism begin to rage with even greater fury and force. Consider, for example, the fall of the Berlin Wall. With the collapse of the Soviet Union, many Christians thought the end times had taken a step backwards. But it was out of this upheaval that the New World Order proclaimed by George H.W Bush and the European Union emerged. So it’s not as one-dimensional as you think it is.
This prediction was well on the mark, because Trump’s victory caused such a shock and upheaval in the so-called “liberal world order” that soon afterwards big internet companies started censoring the free speech of patriots and conservatives all over the world, and during the global pandemic of 2020-22 it extended to all those critics of governments, regardless of their political background, who questioned the legitimacy, humanity and science of the governments’ response to the pandemic. Supporters of the European federal project began to promote with increasing vigour a common European army in response to Britain’s withdrawal from the EU and the US turn against Angela Merkel’s Germany and the EU. In 2018, French President Macron set up a project to assemble a military alliance of ten EU countries which I have speculated was a prelude to Daniel’s prophecy of the ten-horned beast. Four days after Trump’s election, I wrote the following about it:
While Trump wants to improve US relations with Russia, the European Union will look on in horror at his leadership. Mirror reported on 10 October how Nigel Farage, potentially the first foreign leader to meet Trump, said he wanted to work with the incoming US president to “bring down the EU”. The irony, however, is that Farage and Trump’s anti-EU stance will only serve to strengthen the power of the EU (albeit unwittingly). Namely, when European leaders lose their most important ally – the US president – the result is that they will start advocating an ever stronger EU, which would eventually take the place of the US on the global stage.
The US has so far been like a big brother to the EU, which it has known would come to its aid if the big bad Russian bear threatened its eastern partners. Now that big brother is abandoning little brother in allying with the anti-EU Farage, EU leaders are beginning to build their own defence alliance to Europe from Russia. In my July Brexit article, I quoted a revelation in the British Express newspaper in the week following Brexit that the foreign ministers of France and Germany were about to put forward a plan for a European superstate, which would end the existence of European nation states once and for all;
What did I predict about Charles’s role?
In that same article I speculated that the then Prince Charles would emerge as the leader of that united Europe, which may have seemed a very strange theory to many who are not more familiar with my eschatological ideas. But six years later, Brendan Simms, professor of the history of European international relations and director of the Centre for Geopolitics, called for the coronation of Charles III as Emperor of the United States of Europe in the footsteps of the rulers of the Holy Roman Empire. In my article, I also contrasted the political agenda of President Trump and then Prince Charles:
Trump’s speeches and slogans have proven very clearly that his movement is in open warfare against globalists seeking one world government. He has declared his movement’s creed to be, “Americanism, not Globalism.” His political ideas are practically the antithesis of everything Prince Charles stands for.
And I guessed that just as the nationalists had found their hero and “saviour” in Mr Trump, so the globalists and the left would find their hero and saviour in Charles.
I have argued above that Mr Trump’s victory will not necessarily lead to a triumph for nationalism, but to the exact opposite. Trump may dismantle NAFTA [the North American Free Trade Agreement equivalent to the EU], but as a result of Soros-funded anti-Trump riots, it will be replaced by a North American Union that will finally destroy the independence of the United States of America and bring it under a single world government. Meanwhile, the liberal left who voted for Hillary Clinton and cried over her defeat (here a hilarious video of their reactions) – and perhaps a handful of defectors who supported Trump – join a popular movement in revolt against a right-wing administration, which finds its hero and saviour in Prince Charles, whose political ideas resonate with this liberal group of people…
Now that the world has reached an agreement on climate change, Trump’s ascension to the presidency of the world’s most powerful nation provides the globalists with yet another “crisis” with which to advance their goals. Trump’s victory also provides an excuse under which they can claim for the EU the role of world policeman that the US has played so far. Meanwhile, Prince Charles can rise up to “save” the world from Trump. I think this is a very likely prospect even if everything is now more or less speculation about the direction in which things could develop.
This is where I missed the mark a bit because Trump did indeed abolish NAFTA, but in its place was created not the North American Union but the new free trade alliance USMCA, which is more favourable to US economic interests. But I was right that Trump’s victory was seen as a threat to the “liberal world order” by withdrawing from the Paris climate agreement, among other things, and in 2020 Prince Charles played a key role, together with Klaus Schwab, when the World Economic Forum, under the leadership of these two men, set up a project known as the “Great Reset” to save this globalist world order under the guise of overcoming a global pandemic.
June 2. 2020, Charles used his Twitter account to urge people to join the Great Reset project, using political slogans such as “Build Back Better”, which Biden’s presidential campaign later adopted as its own slogan and which the media reported as representing the antithesis of Trump’s nationalist America First agenda. Meanwhile, Charles himself began to appear as a kind of globalist version of Donald Trump, calling on world leaders and business executives to put “the planet and people first” rather than putting the interests of their own citizens first, as Trump urged. I was also right when I predicted that left-wing financial speculator George Soros will fund many left-wing riots against Trump and his supporters. That happened first in the Charlottesville violence of 2017 and even more strongly in the 2020 Black Lives Matter riots sparked by the death of George Floyd.
However, I did not only predict that Prince Charles would emerge as a political counterforce to Trump among the elite, but that he would also become a Trump-like populist figure for the anti-Trump MAGA red-green left, leading a kind of global revolution against capitalism in the footsteps of Lenin and Che Guevara. I wrote about this in January 2017 in my article Will Prince Charles lead the world in an anti-capitalist red-green revolution against Trump and Putin this year, the 100th anniversary of the Russian communist Bolshevik revolution? As the title suggests, my timetable does not always coincide.
But even if the connection is not yet entirely obvious to everyone, during the 2019 global “climate strikes” led by Swedish young climate activist Greta Thunberg after her furious UN speech, Charles became a kind of “climate fuhrer” for many of these young people saturated with climate propaganda. At least Charles himself wanted to appear as an influential voice and advocate for these climate-anxiety-ridden youth. Of course, I will concede that he has not yet achieved the kind of cult leader status that I would have expected by now if he is the Antichrist foretold by Scripture. But as stated above, God’s end-time timetable is beyond my control.
What did I predict about Trump’s Middle East policy?
In September 2017, I predicted that President Trump would likely bring peace to the Middle East in my article How Donald Trump could to bring about a historic Middle East peace deal between Israel and Palestine in the coming months? And would such an agreement make him the Biblical Antichrist? This did not happen “in the coming months” as I assumed in the headline, but in 2020 Trump managed to get a historic peace agreement or normalisation of relations in the Middle East between Israel, the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain in the Abrahamic peace accord. I also wrongly predicted that a peace deal would be reached between Israel and Palestine which did not happen even though Trump proposed a “deal of the century” between the parties (this coincided with Prince Charles visiting Israel for the first time and appearing as a Middle East peacemaker, as I had also predicted would happen years earlier).
But I was right about the Israel-Arab peace deal because I at the time already understood Trump’s foreign policy line and tactics. I wrote in that 2017 article:
The Trump administration’s foreign policy strategy on the Middle East is to kill two – or actually three – birds with one stone. First, it seeks to end its Arab ally financial support for ISIS and other Sunni extremists. Second, it aims to unite the entire Arab world against Iran, which poses a threat not only to Israel and the West, but also to the Sunni state in the region. Thirdly, the US hopes that the common enemy of Israel and the Arabs in Iran will bring them closer together for a historic peace agreement between Israel, Palestine and its Arab supporters. President Trump said he had found “a new reason for hope” during his trip to the Middle East and said peace between Israel and Palestine was his administration’s “ultimate deal”. Making deals is an inherent part of the character who wrote The Art of the Deal. Perhaps the time has also proved propitious for such a deal, despite years of failed peace negotiations.
Until now, the main obstacle to peace has been the attempt to impose it from above by forcing Israel into a two-state solution through boycotts and threats, which has only served terrorist ends and isolated Israel from the community of nations. Any peace agreement could only come about through bilateral negotiations between Israeli and Palestinian leaders where both are serious about the peace process. Trump now has a completely different approach to the Middle East peace process than his predecessors. For example, he is not trying to force Israel into a two-state model as the only path to peace and has said he is open to other options. A Palestinian leader say Donald Trump would present an unconventional peace plan based on the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative. At the heart of it would be the normalisation of relations between Israel and moderate Sunni states. The Trump administration is therefore seeking a peace agreement not just between Israel and Palestine, but between Israel and the Arab world as a whole.
I also wrote: “The liberal mainstream media, of course, laugh at the idea of Trump becoming the initiator of the long-sought Middle East peace agreement, but they also laugh at the idea that he could become the 45th President of the United States.” But I was right and the liberal media was wrong. Not because I was some great prophet and sage, but because I just understood Trump’s personality and his policy much better than liberal journalists suffering from “Trump Derangement Syndrome”. January 2017 I also correctly predicted that Trump would recognise Jerusalem as the undivided capital of Israel:
One sign that President Trump intends to recognise Jerusalem’s status as the undivided capital of Israel is that he has promised to move the US embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.
In the same long article, I cited medieval prophecies and biblical time calculations and concluded that this could occur in either December 2017 or May 2018, when Trump recognized Jerusalem and moved the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem (that article also contained a number of false predictions, but at least this one I got right).
Did I predict the global Covid-19 pandemic ahead of time?
Trump’s otherwise quite successful first term in office ended a little more unhappily when a coronavirus ripped through Wuhan, China, killing more than seven million people worldwide. During the Covid-19 crisis, I was more reluctant to promote theories that the virus had been created as a biological weapon and deliberately released by the likes of Bill Gates, although I often put forward views that were sought to be either censored or denigrated in the mainstream media and on the Big Tech companies. My emphasis was more on the fact that the global elite took advantage of this crisis to create a ‘new normal’ on the pretext of it. However, I wrote in my blog two years before the pandemic broke out:
One factor here is that he [Antichrist/Charles] appears in the world as “saviour” at the right time and under the right circumstances. David Rockefeller has said: “We are on the threshold of global change, all we need is a crisis big enough and nations will accept the new world order.” Whether it’s a global economic collapse, global pandemic, or World War III (or all of them together), the Antichrist is likely to appear in the world in the midst of just such a crisis and offer them a New World Order as a solution, one that will forever destroy national sovereignty and national economies and create one global political, economic and religious world system.
This is exactly what happened in 2020, when Charles emerged from the middle of the Corona pandemic to promote, together with other global leaders, the Great Reset of the world’s economies, under the pretext of the global pandemic. According to Charles and other globalists, it offered a “window of opportunity” to overcome both the climate crisis and the pandemic, because the lockdowns of economies would radically reduce global carbon emissions. In June 2017, I also wrote the following on my blog:
The green movement derives its colour from the green vegetation of the earth, and the colour of the fourth horse in [Revelation] refers precisely to the green vegetation of the earth. This horse is the most terrifying of the four and is followed by death and destruction, killing the fourth part of the earth “with sword and famine and pestilence and the beasts of the earth.” The beasts (thérion) here refers to the wild beasts of the earth whose conservation has been one of the main aims of the Green movement. The plague or pestilence associated with this colour is appropriate in this context as the most radical thinkers in the green movement call for the deliberate creation of a global pandemic to reduce the world’s population. The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), ranked as the world’s leading think tank on national security issues, says that the most dangerous terrorist threat comes not from radical Islamists but from radical environmentalists:
Unfortunately, I think the next wave [of terrorism] will make these jihadists look quite attractive. My fear is the fundamentalist environmentalists – the Earth First… Gaia types, who say we’re corrupting the world, we’re corrupting the earth because of pollution, because of climate change, and in an attempt to save the planet and preserve the human race, you have to kill 80% of the people, because what’s really corrupting the earth is overpopulation, and the only thing that can kill so effectively is biological weapons. This is a hidden biological weapon and you can see this already on some extremists’ websites and it’s really scary. I mean, we are now talking about the death of five billion people.
For decades, Prince Philip of England and his firstborn, Prince Charles, have been the leading proponents of this deep ecological philosophy that calls for the mass murder of human beings. In 1984, Philip told a TV interviewer how the overpopulation of humanity had “reached plague proportions”. In a 2011 BBC documentary celebrating Philip’s 90th birthday, the interviewer asked him directly what he would like to do about this “problem”, to which Philip first thought for a moment about the answer and then asked the female reporter with a devilish grin,“Don’t you guess?” The interviewer said “It could be on a scale from mass sterilisation to greater access to contraception. I don’t know what your views are on what should be done about it.” Faced with an awkward question, Philip laughs and pretends he wouldn’t advocate anything like that. “I would describe it as voluntary family restriction”, he said. However, Philip’s other comments make it very clear that he supports family restriction by totalitarian means and the mass murder of people.
Did I predict Trump’s assassination attempt?
I’m no prophet or clairvoyant, so I couldn’t have known in advance – like Brandon Biggs – that Trump would be assassinated where his ear would only be damaged. But I’ve been predicting Trump’s assassination or attempted assassination on my blog for a long time. I wrote just a few days after Trump’s election.
It is very possible that the elite behind the scenes in the world will get rid of him before the end of his first term in January 2021 or even before he takes office early next year. With his anti-government rhetoric, he has made enemies so powerful that not even the US president can be safe from them. The same people who were behind the assassination of President Kennedy and the ‘car crash’ of Princess Diana may soon be the instigators of the assassination of Donald J. Trump…
An equally possible scenario is that globalists will cause an unprecedented financial crisis and then blame it on Trump’s policies. Or they may incite mass anti-Trump protests in America, which will eventually lead the country into total anarchy and chaos. This is not mere speculation as we have already seen a foretaste of this. Paul Joseph Watson reported the day after Trump’s election victory how riots broke out across America where “Hillary supporters burned American flags and threatened to kill Trump after they lost the election”. These same people who marched throughout the election with slogans like Love Trumps Hate and warned how Trump supporters could not accept a peaceful transfer of power if Hillary Clinton won the election are now rioting across the US and posting on social media, “Someone, ANYONE, PLEASE, take a sniper rifle and kill Trump; shoot him in the head on a whim.” Another wrote, “Death to Trump and all his supporters”..
Despite Brexit and Trump’s victory, the world is not moving towards a restored era of nation-states because the prophecies of the Bible cannot expire in vain. So I do not believe that Rev. 13:7 would have been halted or even delayed by Trump’s victory. Sure, it is possible that Trump would still flip-flop, but I think the more likely scenario is that the globalists will fight him. Under the steer of the anti-Trump media and the George Soros-funded Black Lives Matter movement, the US could enter another civil war, dividing Trump’s supporters and opponents into two distinct groups. As a result of the civil war, the globalists will either force Trump to resign or he will be assassinated in the chaos, just as Abraham Lincoln was shot by an assassin’s bullet at the end of the American Civil War in April 1865. These are wild speculations, but very possible in the light of current developments. When I try to predict the future, I always do so in the light of what can already be inferred from current trends.
This speculation of mine was very far-sighted as the United States was indeed heading for total chaos and another civil war during the 2020 Black Lives Matter riots, funded by George Soros, with the support of the mainstream media and Democrat politicians. I was already aware at the time of Soros’ actions to foment global instability, including his support for the anti-police and Marxist Black Lives Matter movement, as it was reported by The Jerusalem Post in August 2016. In July 2017, I wrote the following:
They are trying to get rid of Trump either by impeaching him or in a quicker way. Paul Joseph Watson wrote in an urgent report how Rodney Howard-Browne, a controversial evangelist famous for the Toronto “laugher revival” of the 1990s, told his congregation how a Republican member of the US Congress had revealed to him a plot to get rid of the President “suddenly”. Browne said everyone “can read between the lines” what he meant by this.
A South African pastor called on people around the world to “pray around the clock for the protection of the President”. Clearly, the forces of darkness are against the Trump presidency. In February, when the President’s wife Melania Trump led the crowd in the Lord’s Prayer in Florida, the left joined Muslims in a war cry of “Alluha Akbar”(Allah is greater) at an anti-Trump rally in New York. A few days later, the witches also gathered to recite their incantations to bring down the Trump government. This month, Trump gave a speech in Warsaw where he praised Poland’s liberation from the yoke of communism and the triumph of Christianity over atheism and said the nations of Europe now face a similar threat from radical Islam.
What did I predict about Trump’s second term?
Trump’s second term hasn’t come to fruition yet, but it seems very likely in light of current developments, as he is seen as the election front-runner and even the anti-Trump CNN channel admitted that he could win a landslide victory like Nixon and Reagan did. And the assassination attempt a week ago and his survival has only increased his chances of victory. To be honest, I have never predicted a second term for Trump because biblical prophecies necessarily require such an outcome. Under President Biden, the anti-Christian agenda was more easily advanced both in the US and globally. Biden’s presidency also saw the rise of Charles as king, the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the Israel-Hamas war and a number of other prophetically significant events.
But I was wrong when I predicted Trump would win the 2020 election and stay in office for the next four years (actually, I don’t think I was wrong about winning part, but I was wrong about Trump’s staying in office). But when I said in my article I was more than 99% sure of Trump’s re-election, I was no more wrong than the mainstream media reporters who also reported that Hillary Clinton would win the 2016 election with more than 99% probability. I was also wrong that Trump would return to power in the middle of Biden’s first term when the 2020 election results would be overturned either by the Supreme Court or at the state level or by Congress via the 1887 Electoral Count Act. It is still possible that the 2020 election fraud will also be exposed to the general public via the mainstream media and the certification of Biden’s victory will be declared illegal. But that doesn’t matter anymore, because it would have no practical effect on anything.
I predicted Trump’s second term because many Christians in America and beyond had prayed for Trump’s victory and because many Christians reported having visions, omens and prophecies that Trump would continue in office. And I personally based my faith in Trump’s second term on the prophecies of Kim Clement, who between 2007 – 2105 had already predicted correctly many things about Trump’s first term before his death in 2016. And because the very end of Trump’s first term was a very unusual event in American history, when Trump did not concede defeat to Joe Biden and did not attend his inauguration, as had happened with all previous inaugurations.
However, Trump’s election dispute came to an end on 6 January following the Capitol debacle and he was forced to hand over his crown to Joe Biden. Further investigations in the months and years that followed, audits and other scientific evidence of fraud in the 2020 election, presented in “pillow guy” Mike Lindell’s documents and Dinesh D’Souza’s documents, among others, gave further credence to my then belief that Biden’s tenure would come to end before 2025. However, this was not the case and I apologized for being wrong about all this in January 2023 in my article My apology that I was wrong. Better late than never.
Update: In a way I was right about Biden’s presidency coming to end before his first term when he declared on 21 July 2024 that he is not seeking the re-election but will give his torch to VP Kamala Harris as I predicted already in August 2021. See: My blog from a couple of years ago where I predicted that Biden would resign and Vice President Kamala Harris would take his place.
I always understood that Trump’s return to the White House in the middle of Biden’s first term would require a very unusual and miraculous event. So I expected a miracle that never came. I wrote about my feelings in October 2022:
I should also point out that when I talk about Trump’s return to power, I am not now referring to his possible candidacy in the 2024 presidential election or his re-election as president in 2024, because I would not consider such a prospect at all miraculous or unlikely. With this statement agree also my detractors, who have mocked me for my belief in Trump’s return in the middle of Biden’s term. But I am waiting a miracle to explain it as God’s work to those who do not believe in our God. I have often referred to the desertification of 2020 election. I refer to the rejection of certified state electoral votes for Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. These votes were certified to Biden on December 14, 2020 and on January 6, 2021 they were officially opened and counted in the US Congress where the President of the Senate, i.e. Vice President Mike Pence, accepted them and declared Biden legally elected President of the United States.
In March 2021, I reported on Trump’s first post-inauguration speech, which was almost immediately censored by YouTube:
Trump used about 15 minutes of his hour-and-a-half speech to confirm his earlier claim that he beat Biden and the election was stolen from him. The CPAC audience joined in wholeheartedly with the ex-president’s complaints and started shouting: “Trump, you won. Trump, you won!” Referring to media rumours that he would run for the 2024 elections, he simply said: “But who knows? I might even decide to beat them for a third time. Okay? For the third time. True.” The second time, of course, referred to last year’s presidential election and the third time to the 2024 elections. In reality, Trump’s candidacy for the 2024 election would be completely useless, because the winner’s trophy would be stolen from him in the same way it was stolen in the last election. Trump’s only path to the White House is therefore to expose election fraud to the public and have the election results overturned by the Supreme Court or some other authoritative body.
Conclusion
As you can see, I have predicted many things right and many things wrong on my blog. And this was not even an exhaustive account of the things I have predicted right or wrong. Nor does God always act according to our own expectations. But if I have expected God to show His miracle and omnipotence through President Trump, we saw that happen just last Saturday when He saved President Trump’s life, as Trump himself said in a speech on Friday where he officially accepted the Republican Party’s presidential nomination. He said: “I shouldn’t be here, but by the grace of God I am.” Brandon Biggs predicted in March that Trump would become a fervent believer through just such a miracle.
In many ways, we can already consider it a miracle that Trump is still standing today and is the front-runner to be the next President of the United States, even though his enemies have tried to do everything they can to break him down and destroy him. Just a few years ago, the world’s richest man Elon Musk said he supported Florida Governor Ron DeSantis for US President, but today Trump has Musk’s full support and has said he will back his presidential campaign with a $45 million monthly donation until the end of the year. But all these attempts to destroy Trump have only made him stronger and reinforced his message of a witch hunt, which he has agreed to suffer only because he loves the American people and wants to give others the same opportunity for a privileged life that America gave him. As Trump has often said: “They’re not after me, they’re after you, and I just happen to stand in their way.”
Author & blogger Samuel Tuominen’s archives 
Leave a comment