In English

This page is being added for my English readers who are scratching their heads and may wonder what kind of website this is. You may also use your browser’s translator tool (in Google Chrome you find this inside the box which appears by right clicking your mouse), but the quality of this automatic translation is often poor and misleading. Title of my website/blog is ”The Antichrist has been revealed today to the Church” and subtitle is citing the 2. Thess 2:3 which says, ”Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition”. Aim of this website is to promote my 700 pages e-book and its eschatological conclusions and others revelations. This page was orginally an e-mail letter of which I sent in august 2016 to internationally acknowledged bestseller authors Tom Horn and Cris Putnam. But since they have not responded to me, I have decided to present this letter in the public domain so that my English readers may know what my book is dealing with. 


Update: Tim Cohen – author of The AntiChrist and a cup of Tea – wrote me on March 12 2017 and said concerning this letter: ”Samuel, thank you for your hard work putting your letter to Tom Horn together; you make a number of very interesting points that I may not have time to incorporate into the second edition of The AntiChrist and a Cup of Tea, but I will certainly recommend that others read your letter.”


2nd Update: Here is my latest English article: 27 independent reasons why I believe that Prince Charles is the biblical Antichrist. 


Hi!

Basic RGB
Cover of Cris Putnam and Tom Horn’s latest book (2016) what for this letter was written.

I was initially looking the email of Tom Horn but I found only this so following letter is adressed to you, Chris, and Tom Horn. I don’t know if there is some preordained purpose on why I am writing to you or not, but I feel a compelling duty to do so. I apologize that my english is perhaps far from perfect due to the fact that my native tongue is Finnish and I am not very educated person or good in languages. In fact I live on the bottom on my society because I got very bad grades on my primary school (in Finland the first nine or ten terms from age 7 to 15 before high school or secondary school) and after that I have been unemployed getting my livelihood from the state – frankly from taxpayers- , of which I have never been proud of – quite opposite – but this is a pathetic situation of my life because I have diagnosed life-restricting mental problem (OCD or obsessive compulsive disorder) which has prevented me get employed. Besides it is almost impossible to get a job in Finland if you have only a weak primary school certificate and not a higher school examination (even for those who has a doctorate degree it is hard to get jobs in these days). Now there is some 70 000 marginalized persons in Finland (whereof 2/3 are youths like me) and that is costing to our society more than two billion euros every year.

I am now 28 (born in 1988 when many evangelicals were expecting the end of the world) and I have been studying the Bible prophecy since I was just pre-teen at the age of 12 or 13 (concurring with time after 9/11). But when I said that I am not educated person this doesn’t mean that I don’t venerate the academic knowledge of learned and scholarly persons like you (which isn’t always so when speaking of lower-class uneducated citizens like me). It doesn’t also mean that I haven’t read books or studied the history and different schools of eschatology, history of Church and other areas. I mean ”uneducated” in terms of academic education system of our hierarchical society. I don’t succeeded in my school because I was bullied and discriminated by my schoolmates due to my Christian faith which I demonstrated openly at the age of eleven when I string up on my neck the very striking four-inch crucifix. On the swimming lessons they used to sneer, ”Hey Jesus, we want to see if you can walk on the water!”.

But I believe that God has been purpose for my life which would not have been possible to come true if my life would have gone more normal course with ”normal” youth and adulthood. On ”normal” I mean cars, girlfriends, friends, partying, a job, education, military service, marriage, etc. – this stereotype of male lifespan in its youth which has been absent in my life because I have devoted my life to study of eschatology which is often very lone, dark and rough road to walk. On some times I felt that my life was totally worthless and in those dark moments I tought that it would be better that I had never been born. But irony is that study of eschatology – study of ”end of the world” – gave me purpose and meaning for my life. Especially after that when I finished my lifetime achievement – a ebook of 700 hundred pages and some 1300 source references (on standard book format that takes some 900 pages). This kind of achievement would been utterly fanciful to me yet five years ago when I was fret how to write at least 100 or 200 hundred pages.

But I did it. And I don’t think that would be anyway possible without help of Holy Spirit and His divine guidance which was driving me through the research and writing process which took me some 10 years to complete (a book itself was written between 2012 – 2014). Since I finished my manuscript in December 2014, I have been maintaining a website and blog on the Internet which is based on my book and where I have published almost 90 long articles and posts since January 2015. There is only a one problem here. This book and articles on my websites are written in Finnish. So you can’t read it in your own mother tongue, although today it is possible that you can translate any foreign website into english – or vica versa – before you can say Jack Robinson (by the way, who the heck is he?).

For example, on Google Chrome this requires only right-click of your mouse and there you find this translate tool. But quality is often bad because translation is made by the computer and not a human person. Of course there is also pay services like notaatio or bigtranslation. I checked out this last one and it provides translations at the cost of 0.03 to 0.09 euros per word. I did the math. My book has about 270 000 words. So if I order this company to translate it, cost would be ”only” 8100 – 24 300 euros. Maybe I’ll pass because I have only few hundred euros on my bank account. At this moment you are probably wondering why I am telling this to you. I hadn’t heard either of you until july 2016 when I found your interview on Jim Bakker show which was reported in Charisma News.

Then I found your latest book, ”The Final Roman Emperor, The Islamic Antichrist and the Vatican’s Last Crusade” which I ordered from Amazon.uk some three weeks ago. I just finished it and I also watched your two discourses with Sid Roth on his show It’s Supernatural (on that other Tom Horn spoke of your newest book). Like I said, I am not very good in the languages – meaning that I can speak only Finnish and maybe some broken and misspelled English -, so to me it is not easy to read English books and I have to pass many words without understanding their meaning but I can read well enough to understand what I read. So why I ordered your book and why I’m writing to you now? In the first place, I think that you are right persons to whom write because you have a mind of investigator – always curious for new revelations.



On page nine Tom Horn wrote that those who believe that God has given them something precious should ”not give dogs what is sacred; do not throw your pearls to pigs. If you do, they may trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you to pieces.” (Matthew 7:6). Maybe that was also my own experience when I was too young and eager to share my beliefs with others. So I was shot down even by my own family members who considered them as ridiculous. In spite of this, I never let this discourage me and I continued persistently my research which led to this 700-pages book and subsequently my website and blog. I was also spurred by the Bible verse which I got once in prayer via one brother in Christ (in 2006 on Iso Kirja Bible College where I was on basic course) who told me that when praying he received into his spirit the Bible verses which were targeted to others in the room. Because he got only a number of that verse, I had to check it out and when I read it I felt that message was intended personally to me. This Bible verse was 1. Timothy 4:12-13:

Let no one look down on your youthfulness, but rather in speech, conduct, love, faith and purity, show yourself an example of those who believe. Until I come, give attention to the public reading of Scripture, to exhortation and teaching. (NASB).

Now I am teaching publicly the Bible prophecy on my website. And my family members who were initially ridiculing my beliefs, are now boosting my website and book and promoting it to even those who doesn’t share our Christian faith. Orginal reason in my research was address my book to Finnish prophecy and Bible teacher Leo Meller (b. 1942) who has been one of the most famous dispensationalist prophecy teacher In Finland since 60’s. He is diciple of Ensio Lehtonen (1906 – 1971) who belonged to pentacostal movement and who supported the jewish state before it was even born. Lehtonen founded publishing house Kuva ja Sana Oy in 1942 and Meller became its president when Ensio Lehtonen passed away (now he is retired but still active speaker). Orginally my purpose was to ask if Kuva ja Sana can publish my manuscript. Meller answered me in February 2015 and said that my manuscript is too large and Kuva ja Sana can’t take the economical risk to publish it.

But in that same letter he also said that he had asked paper print for my manuscript and he was very interested and curious to know how I ended up on my conclusions. He also said that my ”reading and management of things is astonishingly interesting”. In American comparison this is like Hal Lindsey would say those words to you, so it was a quite emotional moment to me. From then on I have received only two reviews from those who has read it entirely. Both of them gave me very positive review of it saying that my thesis revolutionized their understanding on eschatology and acclaimed its historical background information. They said that my information shocked and my arguments convinced even they were initially totally skeptical on my hypothesis. So what is my hypothesis? This hypothesis concerns the identity of the man of lawlessness, identity of the Antichrist.

In my book I basically claim that identity of the Antichrist has been revealed to few Christians over three decades now but it has been hidden from the sight of mainstream Christians due to conflicting schools, popular misconseptions, spiritual darkness, and lack of understanding in the midst of global Church of Jesus Christ. Because there seems to be very persistent doctrine inside dispensationalist premillenialism whereby it’s impossible to know the identity of the Antichrist before seven year tribulation period (doctrine of which origin is in Scofield Reference Bible), I dedicated the first part of my book (Chapter one and two) to debunk this idea with systematic study of the second chapter of 2. Thess. and timing of the tribulation and rapture in Revelation. But when I was arguing against this popular ”rapture of Church on 2. Thess. 2:7 and Revelation 4:1” -doctrine, I did not argue against pretribulation rapture itself. Instead I demonstrated how Paul, John and John N. Darby supported the idea that rapture can’t take place ”unless the apostasy comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction” (2. Thess. 2:3).

In the second part of my book (Chapters three, four and five) I surveyed this Islamic Antichrist theme of which you also wrote in your book. In Chapter three I explored those interpretations which says that the Antichrist comes from some part of the ancient Assyria and those which says he is European. In Chapter four I asked if he is radical muslim or not, and Chapter five examines if he is jewish or gentile. Then in the third part of my book (Chapters six, seven, eight and nine) I focused on political, economic and philosophic issues and its main purpose is to demonstrate how the political system of the Beast is nothing but resurrected fascism, not nationalistic fascism of 30’s but fascistic world state what elites of the west and elites of freemansonry and other secret societys, have aspired more than 200 years now.

After third part this book is only at the halfway. Almost one third of my book’s pages is used for part four (Chapters 10, 11A, 11B and 11C). This is the most important part of my book. Because it demonstrates with detailed historical data how it is totally possible to integrate and merge seemingly discordant eschatological interpretations like historicism and futurism (premillenial dispensationalism). I think that this may interest Chris Putnam because Sid Roth said that you are an expert on the subjects of reformation, so I assume that you know very well this historicistic eschatology of early protestants who saw the Western Papacy and Eastern islamic Ottoman empire as continuing of eastern and western parts of the Roman empire and thus eastern and western legs of statue of Daniel 2. And moreover they saw those antichristian systems of governance as fulfillment of the prophecy of Little Horn in Daniel 7 and 8.

Futuristic prophecy teachers of dispensationalistic eschatology have said since 19th Century that Papacy wasn’t the Antichrist (and thus Little Horn of Daniel 7) because the Antichrist is individual who emerges at the end of the world, makes deceitful covenant with Israel and cause abomination of desolation in the third Temple of Jerusalem as prophecied in Daniel 8:11 9:27, 11:31, Mattew 24:15, 2. Thess. 2:4 and Revelation 11:2. But as demonstrated in my book with details, those are not in fact conflicting views when we take into consideration this dual or multiple fulfillments of a variety of prophecies across time (which is common knowledge amongs the prophecy teachers) and that horns, kings and beasts does not means not only a individual leaders but also the kingdoms, empires, royal houses, and all kind of systems of governance, either religious or temporal (as this is demonstrated clearly in the prophecies of the Daniel and Revelation).

In my book I do not apply the eschatology of historicism to any other parts of the Bible than to Book of Daniel. My interpretations of Apocalypse of St. John are down the line with those who say that judgments of the seven seals, seven trumpets and seven bowls doesn’t regards a time of the Church period but time of the Tribulation or the seventieth week of the Daniel 9 (with few exceptions). But in terms of the Book of the Daniel, it is reasonable to ask why it is correct to teach that there is dual fulfillment for Little Horn of Chapter 8 as we all know this, but when it comes to the Little Horn of Daniel 7 there is only a single fulfillment. If there is dual fulfillment for Chapter 8, then it is quite consistent to assume that there is dual fulfillment also for Chapter 7. In fact there seem to be more than just two fulfillment because I have demonstrated how there is at least three fulfillments for Daniel 7 and 8 across time.

Those three fulfillments follows linearly whole history of the world and its most important moments from the time of Daniel until Second Coming of Jesus Christ. There is no historical breaks or gaps coinciding with the Jewish diaspora – or the time of Church history – as Darby’s dispensationalism has taught. This kind of gap what dispensationalism teach is only in vision of 70 weeks of Daniel 9 because it was explicitly mentioned that this vision was ”determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity”. On the contrary, visions of the Daniel 2, 7, 8 and 11 was about to tell future of the gentiles before the Second Coming. So on those basis I have shown in my book how it is fully possible to integrate and fine-tune those two most prevalent schools of the Bible prophecy since days of Martin Luther.

Within this integrated system I have demonstrated with great historical details how reformers were basically right when they connected the vision of little horn of Daniel 7 to Papacy and vision of little horn of Daniel 8 to Islam or Ottoman empire. One of those famous persons who interprented prophecies of Daniel this way was Sir Isaac Newton who presented his eschatological views on his book Observations upon the Prophecies of Daniel, and the Apocalypse of St. John (1733). Many may have heard his prediction that the world will end in 2060. But that prediction was based on his historicistic interpretation of Daniel 7 and many of his conclusions of this vision and its adaptations to events of late antique are actually erreous – not more like those of seventh day adventists who adapts this vision for their undated views on history and eschatology. The most historically and Scripturally accurate interpretation was given in 1831 by British Methodist theologian and biblical scholar Adam Clarke in his massive Bible commentary which ”took him 40 years to complete and which… may be the most comprehensive commentary on the Bible ever prepared by one man.”

In this commentary Clarke predicted that City of Rome and the Seat of Papacy will perish in 2016 AD, and after that Jesus will return on the Earth. This coincided with 1260 prophetic years of Papacy what was foretold in Daniel 7:25 and which started in 756 when Papal States was created with the help of the donation of Pepin the Short, king of the Franks, ”which made the Pope for the first time as a temporal ruler” Main starting point for this forgotten interpretation of Daniel’s Little Horn is that prophecy of ten horns, ten kings, and three plucked horns, already fulfilled (even not in its final form) in late Antique in 476 AD and subsequent Centuries. In my book it is proved with secular historical chart that in 476 AD when Western Roman Empire collapsed, there were exactly 10 kingdoms inside the borders of late Roman Empire. This was also prediction of early Church Fathers. They believed that the Antichrist – individual Antichrist – will rise when Roman Empire fall and not over 1500 years after that. Following statement comes from St. Cyril of Jerusalem (c. 315-386):

At first indeed he will put on a show of mildness (as though he were a learned and discreet person), and of soberness and benevolence: and by the lying signs and wonders of his magical deceit a having beguiled the Jews, as though he were the expected Christ, he shall afterwards be characterized by all kinds of crimes of inhumanity and lawlessness, so as to outdo all unrighteous and ungodly men who have gone before him displaying against all men, but especially against us Christians, a spirit murderous and most cruel, merciless and crafty. And after perpetrating such things for three years and six months only, he shall be destroyed by the glorious second advent from heaven of the only-begotten Son of God, our Lord and Saviour Jesus, the true Christ”.

Now I’m going to reveal why I decided to write you in the first place. Your book caught my attention because its main theme was eerily akin to my own book’s main theme. Even its name is quite similar. Name of my book is Muhammad, Charles the Great and the Antichrist (in english). This is reference to founder of the Islam and founder of the Western Civilization. Charles the Great was crowned by the Pope Leo III as the new Emperor of the Romans in the City of Rome on Christmas day 800 AD. This tradition continued in kings of Germany or Holy Roman Emperors until 16th Century when Holy Roman Emperor Charles V was the last one who was crowned by the pope even formal title ”Emperor of the Romans” continued till days of Napoleon Bonaparte who destroyed the Empire – or ”the First Reich” as dubbed in later Nazi propaganda – in 1806.

Having said that, that reformers were right about the pope (as you also agreed on your book), you may think that I will declare the pope as the Antichrist. No! I believe that pope is the Second Beast of Revelation 13 alias the False Prophet. And you provided some compelling evidences in your book why Pope Francis may be the Final Pope of the Rome and the False Prophet of the Revelation who will rule the world with the First Beast or the Antichrist, his political ally who is also the Final Roman Emperor as this is congruous with some prophecies of the Bible (e.g. Dan. 9:27, Rev. 13:1, 17:9) It is interesting to find that there is also Catholic Theologian Dr. Kelly Bowring who teaches on his books and website that Pope Francis is not only Petrus Romanus but also the False Prophet of Revelation. Prophecy of St. Malachy about Petrus Romanus and its connection to Pope Francis was familiar to me before I ordered your book and at times I have referred to it in my book and blog articles.

Medieval prophecies about the Last Roman Emperor and Mahdi of Islamic eschatology were also familiar to me, because they are very important part of my book’s contents and its arguments. I mentioned this Apocalypse of Pseudo-Methodius already on the third Chapter of my book. I also dealth with this just war doctrine of Church Father Augustinus in Chapter four where I cited the writings of Catholic apologists about doctrine of just war and Crusades. I stress this parallelism between our books because on page 15 you stated that connection between Mahdi, the Last Roman Emperor and the Antichrist is ”startling revelation that no other modern writers or researchers have made”. This statement wasn’t fully true as you have now realized. But I believe that you are missing very important part of the big picture especially considering the identity of this Last Roman Emperor and thus identity of the Man of Sin.

And this, Chris and Tom, was the main reason why I wanted to write you. So lets start (I haven’t yet start). I don’t ask you buy my beliefs. I just present you some startling information of which you may have never heard and I also give you some links and books from where you can do your own objective and indenpendent examination. To be honest I actually disagreed with some of your (and Derek Gilbert) eschatological conclusions in Chapter 11 and 12, but that is a side issue. Main important is that you seem to think that the Last Roman Emperor may be also islamic Mahdi, Jewish False Messiah and the Antichrist of New Testament. And so door is ajar to me to present my own discoveries. Actually amount of information on this topic is so extensive that I can only give you some tips what to follow. I can’t present all of my arguments in this letter because it would require other 700 pages.

71smg48rjslMy initial hypothesis on this subject is based on the book which name is The Antichrist and a Cup of Tea (Prophecy House, 1998). Its author is a Messianic Jew Tim Cohen who himself based his initial hypothesis on the analysis of other Messianic Jew, Monte Judah who with the help of his early personal computer and guidance of prayer found in 1982 that name and official title of Prince Charles count up 666 when using original Hebrew and Greek gematria system and its application to English alphabet. This is the system whereby the early Church Fathers tried to calculate the ”Number of the Beast” according to Revelation 13:18. Monte Judah published his findings in 1987 and it showed that not only the English title of Prince Charles (Charles, Prince of Wales) do match with the Number of the Beast but also his Hebrew title according to Hebrew-Greek gematria system. Monte Judah also noticed that Charles is a prince just like Daniel 9:27 and 11:21 foretold about the Antichrist. You can get acquainted with his findings in Chapter three of The Antichrist and a Cup of Tea (in my own book I also cited the original text of Monte Judah but it is now removed from the Internet).

So this Revelation 13:18 connection was the orginal cause for this theory that Prince Charles could be the Son of the Perdition. It was popular theory in some prophecy circuits in early 90’s and you can find internet articles and writings for and against it since midway of 90’s. In Tim Cohen’s book this orginal hypothesis was taken to more deeper level and there is a various range of good documented cases and revelations about more darker side of British royal family what support this orginal hypothesis of Monte Judah. On pages 5 – 8 there is critical acclaims for this book from many renowned prophecy teachers including Chuck Missler and late Dave Breese. There is also review of your friend Sid Roth who writes:

The Antichrist and a Cup of Tea by Tim Cohen is the most comprehensive study of why Prince Charles could be the Antichrist. What is more important than the Antichrist’s identity [however] is the Antichrist system that this book uncovers…

As far as I know Tim Cohen was on Sid Roth show It’s Supernatural in 2000 and you find their discourse from here. I myself interested about this subject – what most people hold at first hearing as ridiculous as my parents did when I first spoke about this to them – in 2004 when I was still in my primary school. It was the translated article of Cutting Edge Ministry on here which caught my interest because it spoke about the book of Tim Cohen – of which I had never heard before that – and plans of Brazilian town to construct a giant statue for Prince Charles which was idolizing him as god-like savior of the world. I read Tim Cohen’s book in 2008 and since then when I started to explore this issue nothing has falsified my (or Monte Judah/Tim Cohen’s) orginal hypothesis on this issue.

In fact when I have observed those arguments which present that Pope Francis is the False Prophet of the Revelation, and those arguments which present that Prince Charles is the Antichrist, l think that first one not come even close in the amount of evidences compared to this latter. After all there is only three major arguments which support this first hypothesis. These are: 1) antichristian history of papacy, 2) prophecy of St. Malachy, 3) antichristian beliefs and acts of Pope Francis. You may add some others, but in the conclusion of my book I have listed 28 prophecies about the Antichrist from the Old an New Testament which are either fulfilled or which has a great potential to fulfill or which are indicating their fulfillment in Prince Charles. And with mathematical examples I have demonstrated that likelihood that these all come true in one person, is one in 1057 (1 and 57 zeros). Perhaps more wiser persons can challenge my calculations because I am not mathematican but H. Harold Hartzler from American Scientific Affiliation has confirmed related probability calculations as Hal Lindsey pointed out in his book Planet Earth: The Final Chapter (1998).

GematriaChart-Nov01-bw
In this ancient gematry system for Hebrew   and Greek, which is arranged also for English alphabets, 23rd english letter W equals 0 due to the fact that Hebrew alphabets has only 22 letters and 400 is its utmost numerical value.

In english this means that it is more likely that you spot one particular star from the night sky if all stars would be visible to our eyes and if there would be as many multiverses visible to our eyes as there are stars in our universe (then we would be probably blind from the amount of light). It seems to me that most people are already blind, not from the amount of light but the amount of spiritual darkness. Implausibly becomes even more greater if we would list all internal ”coincidences”. For example, when I listed those fulfillments I did not take account of internal fulfillments – such as title of Prince Charles adds the 666 in both languages Hebrew and English. So in my list that was only a one fulfillment, not two fulfillments. It would be noteworthy to ask what is the probability that one name calculates 666 in two different languages and two different alphabets but in the same Hebrew-Greek gematry which is based decimal numbers (A=1, B=2… J=10, K=20… S=100, T=200).

It is interesting to note that there has been only two persons in the history of the mankind who held this title (Charles, Prince of Wales) previously. Those were Charles I and Charles II from the House of Stuart before they ascended to English throne. History books tell us that they were only English monarchs who were associated with the Biblical prophecies about the Antichrist – not because of their title (that was likely unknow knowledge to authors of 17th Century), but because they were connected to apocalyptical beliefs of premillenial movement of Fifth Monarchists. For example C. A. Patrides says in his book The Apocalypse in English Reneissance thought and literature (page 117), that it was common belief among the Fifth Monarchists that Charles I was the Antichrist even if more popular belief at the time was that Antichrist was Papacy and Turkish Empire and English kingdom was in holy war against the Antichrist of Rome and her allies.

As regard to name Charles itself – which etymologic meaning is ”a man” (”count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man – Revelation 13:18) – Roman Catholic mystics have also connected this name to apocalyptical context. In fact it is identified expressly as the name of the Last Roman Emperor, name of the Antichrist. There was a website which is not longer working but which said that Charles was the most commonly associated name for the Last Roman Emperor in those medieval prophecies. It was a quite logical choice because the first Roman Emperor who was crowned by the pope was also Charles as well as the last one, Charles V, a man who summoned the Council of Trent and thus triggered the persecution of protestants.

For example, ”The Chronicle of Magdeburg (12th century?) is quoted ’Of the blood of the Emperor Charles the Great and the King of France shall arise as Emperor named Charles who shall rule imperially in Europe, by whom the decayed estate of the Church shall be reformed and the ancient glory of the Empire again restored.’ Aystinger – the German (also in the 12th century) places this prince in the last times, who is sprung from the Emperor Charles. He is to recover the land of promise, i.e. the promised land Jerusalem, and reform the church as Emperor of Europe. One author who cites those prophecies is Edward Connor in his work Prophecy For Today (first edition published in 1957). You also find these previously mentioned fragments from this web article which associates those predictions directly to current Prince of Wales. This is quite well-grounded conclusion.

It is well know fact among the royal genealogist that British royal family descends from Emperor Charles the Great of the Frankish Empire who is labelled as ”the Father of Europe”. On page 260 you cited the prophecy of Bartholomew Holzhauser who predicted that this Last Roman Emperor will be ”a descendant of Louis IX [of France] yet a descendant also of an old German imperial family, born in exile. He will rule supreme in temporal matters.” Again this match with Prince Charles who is a direct descendant of Louis IX and he also belongs ”an old German imperial family, born in exile.” House of Windsor is not actually British royal family because its name was changed during WWI by the King George V who wanted to bury his family’s old Germanic roots at the time of great antagonism against the Imperial Germany (in spite of that royal family has been always proud of their Germanic roots). House of Windsor is in fact Germanic House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha. Prince Philip, spouse of Queen Elizabeth II, was also member of Dano-Germanic House of Glücksburg, who ruled the Greek where Philip was born, before he married into British royal family.

In some prophecies a symbol of medieval French monarchy, fleur-de-lis (white lily) is connected to this Final Roman Emperor which is worth mentioning because today it is symbol of British royal family and it appears in the heraldic badge of the Prince of Wales. Okay! At this point you may think, ”quite interesting coincidences”. But at the same time you may also think, ”no way, it can not be Prince Charles, he is too wimp, too despised, too old, too… too everything!”. He has too big ears, right? (and this is supposed to be a good counter-argument?). This is actually the level of argumentation among those who make fun of this claim. But at the same time they seem to be totally ignorant that this is exactly what the Bible foretold about the personality and public image of the Man of the Lawlessness before he ascends into global adoration (Dan. 11:21).

If you think that those were amazing coincidences, you don’t know yet nothing. I only scratched the surface with some appetizing starters. When it comes to medieval prophecies of Last Roman Emperor, these are not actually Biblical but extra-Biblical prophecies – just like those who concern the Mahdi. This was one of the reasons why I don’t included aforementioned coincidences into this list about 28 Bible prophecies on Antichrist and their fulfillments in Prince Charles. But predictions concerning the Last Roman Emperor, Mahdi, Maitreya, ”hippie Christ” of Buddhism and New Age, and others non-Biblical heroes/anti-heroes of the end time, and their fulfillment in Prince Charles (yes, he can also fulfill all predictions about Mahdi, Maitrey and Jewish Messiah, ie. False Messiah, not the real One) shows how it is possible that one day all kind of false religions around the world will receive this man as their long awaited savior of the mankind as Prince Charles is already named and honored in the statue which will be erected upon the Brazilian state of Tocantins.

So to illustrate my reasoning, this covers only a one fulfillment out of 28. I refer to Rev. 13:8 which says: ”And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.” It doesn’t take account all those inner fulfillments that shows how Prince Charles actions, beliefs and genealogy match with those predictions about Mahdi, Maitreya, Last Roman Emperor and Jewish Messiah. When it comes to Jewish Messiah I did not incorporated that into this previously mentioned fulfillment because I counted it to be too prominent part of the Bible prophecy and not just part of Rev. 13:8. In other words, Bible prophecy indicates very clearly in many verses that the Antichrist will be the Pseudo Messiah of Israel (but not in any way a friend of Israel like Derek Gilbert seemed to imply in Chapter 12 of your book) and this is why I separated it as an indenpendent fulfillment.

For now I have listed merely three fulfillments: 1) Name that calculates 666 in Hebrew-Greek gematria – system which was approved by early Church Fathers – in both English and Hebrew, 2) Bible prophecies which indicates that Antichrist has Jewish origin or legal claims to throne of David, 3) Prophecy of Rev. 13:8 what predicts that whole world with its countless civilizations and religions will one day recognize the Antichrist as their Savior. But just like those three, every other fulfillment is scrutinized carefully with comprehensive documentary and source materials. It was pretty hard to compact all my arguments about this subject into one book and that was the reason why it became so voluminous that my potential publisher discarded it. This is because all out of those 28 Biblical fulfillments would require its own book – or at least its own Chapter.

Of course I did’t cobbled together my book in this way because it has only 12 long Chapters and not 28, and because there is also many other areas of discussion what I had to dealt with. But far from that is is only repetition for those arguments what Tim Cohen already presented in his own book, my book takes this topic more deeper level than any previous author has done (there is also New Zealender John D. Christian who has written about this in his ebooks but I don’t agree with all his eschatological conclusions). There is only some 10 fulfillments I have listed from Tim Cohen’s revelations (in first edition of The Antichrist an a Cup of a Tea). Many of them I have expanded or handled with greater details or with additional information and new updated revelations concerning the British royal family. There are many things what Tim Cohen hasn’t mentioned about Prince Charles and royal family.

Sun Nazi Salute - Queen - TWEETS.jpg
Princess Elizabeth, current Queen Elizabeth II, and her mother and uncle Edward display fanatical Nazi salute in this secret home video from 1933 which was leaked to Sun newspaper in July 18 2015.

One example of this is the Nazi history of British royal family, which is a well documented case among the many royal biographers and venerated historians. Prince Philip is even confessed publicly that his family ”had ’inhibitions about Jews,’ sympathized with Nazis”. Both families – family of Elizabeth II and family of Prince Philip – had sympathies toward the Nazis. Edward VIII even advised Hitler to bomb the London during the Blitz. In my book I have documented crude antisemitism of not only Edward VIII and relatives of Prince Philip but also Elizabet Bowes-Lyon, Geoge VI and Princess Margaret, parents and sister of Queen Elizabeth II. Then there is many pointers which suggest that Prince Charles also hates the Jews and the Israel (in fact this is a well-know information among the British and American intelligence circles). So broad information relating to this is fulfillment ”number four” (although those were not in this order).

Fulfillment of this refer to several Bible verses which says that although the Antichrist will initially deceive the Israel causing them to believe he is their Messiah, in the end he will turn against them and send his army against the Jerusalem and cause in the Jewish temple the abomination of desolation (Dan. 8:11, 9:27, 11:31, 41, Zech. 14:2, Matt. 24:15, Luke 21:20, 2 Thess. 2:4, Revelation 11:2, 12:14). So Antichrist is not a friend of Jews and Israel, like Derek Gilbert incorrectly reasoned in Chapter 12 of your book. I don’t also believe that Zech. 14:2 is referring to Battle of Armageddon as you concluded in Chapter 11 but it refers to that same event where Jesus was referring when he said in Matt. 24:15: ”When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand) Then let them which be in Judaea flee into the mountains. This is in the line with other prophecies (see above verses) which speak about the same thing and which will happen at the midway of tribulation period.

As you have seen now, these are indicative fulfillments, not the ones that has already realized, but which has a very great potential to come true. These are just few examples what my book is dealing with, but with those you can get a some kind of picture of it. Title of my book contrast the two historic figures, Muhammad and Charles the Great. This is appropriate because just like title of your book contrast the Final Roman Emperor and the Islamic Antichrist, my book claims that the Antichrist is not only the Final Roman Emperor – descendant of Charles the Great – but also the Islamic Antichrist (i.e. Mahdi) – descendant of Muhammad. And believe or not, Prince Charles is also a direct descendant of prophet (from that certain offshoot where Mahdi is predicted to be descended from). But that itself connects to more broader eschatological context and debates. I mentioned previously that my book integrates the two main schools of protestant denomination on eschatology, namely historicism and futurism.

This is not a separate issue of question of the identity of the Antichrist. It was a unanimous view among the reformers and early protestants until 19th Century that prophecies on the Antichrist in the Book of Daniel referred to both, Islamic caliphate or Ottoman Empire and western Popedom. So it was the Sultan of Turkish Ottoman Empire – follower of Muhammad – and Pope or Holy Roman Emperor – follower of Charles the Great – , who were forerunners for the Final Antichrist according to this early protestant comprehension about the Bible prophecy. So basically reformers knew this centuries before this modern dispute inside premillenial dispensationalism whether Antichrist is Syrian or European, Muslim or Pseudo-Christian. One thing is whether there is really those Bible prophecies which supports those who says that he is either Syrian, European or Jewish. But question is not either or.

I’m familiar with book which name is The Antichrist by Arthur W. Pink. This classic from 1923 supports the premillenial futurism (and dispensationalism) and represent ”complete collection of all the Bible’s references to an antichrist figure, from both the Old and New Testaments. ” In online shop Amazon it has received full five stars from most of its readers and one writes that, ”All my years of hearing and studying, I have never encountered such a complete and scriptural commentary on the antichrist. There are no words sufficient to describe this man’s understanding of God and His word.” When I cited this kind of books in my work, I’m convinced that those who supports either Syrian, European or Jewish Antichrist doesn’t see the big picture. What makes Prince Charles instead amazingly unchallenged candidate is that he can fulfill all those prophecies about the Antichrist whether they indicated his Jewish, European or Syrian origin.

Actually every aspect of Prince Charles’s family background and his nationality match with those prophecies about the origins of the Antichrist what Arthur W. Pink underlines in his masterful study. But you will not understand this just by reading this book because Pink does not say that Antichrist will come from the British isles. He doesn’t also understand more recent interpretations which indicates that the Antichrist must have also germanic family roots (like alluded in third fulfillment of Daniel 8). Neither he also comprehend this integrated interpretation between historicism and futurism – which by the way is also endorsed by Tim Cohen in his work Messiah, History, and the Tribulation Period (another acclaimed work of Tim Cohen) – which lead ultimately to greatest revelation of my book. This revelation is demonstrated with historical details in Chapters 10, 11A, 11B and 11C (part four).

It shows how visions of Daniel in Chapters seven, eight and eleven not only foretold the history of Antiques in Middle East and Europe but also history of Middle Ages and Modern Age in equally specific details as they predicted the history of Antiques. And this revelation carry us to apprehend the second fulfillment of vision of Daniel 11. This vision on its dual fulfillment is parallel to previous visions and their multiple fulfillments in Chapters seven, eight and eleven. And second fulfillment of Daniel 11 foretells the whole history of the Middle East (and Europe) since times of 4th Century BC until rebirth of Jewish state in 1948 (when Prince Charles was also born) and time of Antichrist and Second Coming. This revelation is the most important part of my book revelations because it show that not only personality of Prince Charles is possible to identify from figure of Daniel 11:21-45, but also his forefathers George VI, George V and George III from figures of individual Kings of North in verses 6-20.

This is first its kind of study on Bible prophecy which demonstrate, for example, how rise of of Islam in Arabian and Turkish empires was foretold with historical details in the Book of Daniel. It demonstrate how the rise and fall of Catholic, British, Russian and Germanic Empires were foretold in the Bible. It demonstrate how WWI, WWII and Cold War was foretold in the Bible. The Great Greco-Persian conflict between Sassanid Empire and Byzantine Empire in 7th Century AD was predicted in particular details in Chapter eight and eleven of Book of Daniel. Fall of Constantinople in 1453, rise of the Colonial Empires, Reformation and subsequent Thirty Years Wars, Napoleonic Wars and events of 19th and 20th Century – all they find their places in visions of Daniel and St. John (in the latter only when it comes to time of Church in Chapters 2 – 3).

Those who have already waded my book from its first page to its last page (both of those aforementioned made a full eight-hours working days and still read it as fast as in two weeks, meaning that they read 50 pages per day), have said that above mentioned was my book’s most interesting portion and that my reasoning was convincing and exceptional thorough. I say this not because I want to boast but because endorsement from those who have read my book is stronger verification than my own advertisement. I had correspondence with Tim Cohen in April 2015 and althought he didn’t endorsed my book’s claim that Prince Charles and his forefathers has been described in Daniel 11, he said that he was very interested to know more about my justifications and admitted that this may be a missed piece of which he has ignored. He also endorsed my integrated system of eschatology which merge the preterism, historicism and futurism and said following:

Second, concerning your own work, you state: ’It is scriptural and historic merge of historicism and futurism.’ I am particularly curious regarding your conclusions here. In fact, very few have ever even begun to have this insight (apart from common understandings of dual or multiple fulfillments of a variety of prophecies across time), though you will find that my upcoming series goes very far beyond this, demonstrating that all the weeks of scripture are patterned after the Crucifixion Week, and that once these weeks are all harmonized, there is a testable and provable merger between the futurist, idealist (symbolical), historicist and preterist views, as well as the various combinations of them, and that this unified approach also enable disproving those aspects of each view that are actually false or mistaken while simultaneously greatly expanding the import of each of these ’schools’ or views. So, that you would even suggest a merger between one or more aspects of historicism and futurism intrigues me. I was not much younger than you (22 I believe) when I first recognized what I’ve just shared, and in fact, it has been my lifelong study of that realization, along with what I also knew at 22 about Prince Charles, that has led to all my written works, including those that are upcoming. Samuel, you are on the right track with this.

Althought there seem to be in Cohen’s work Messiah, History, and the Tribulation Period some profound theories about this integrated system of eschatology and its connection to Crucifixion Week (and Tribulation Week and Week of History as author puts it), which I don’t yet fully comprehend (because I haven’t read it), main point there is that he endorses this system of integrated eschatology by which I ended up on my conclusions that Prince Charles is identified in the second fulfillment of Daniel 11 as the Antichrist with definite details. Other interesting part of this integrated system of prophecy interprention is the fact, as I already mentioned in this letter, that it seem to requiring the destruction of Rome, Vatican or Papacy (first historic fulfillment of Daniel 7:8, 24) in 2016, as reasoned in Chapter 10 of my book and as confirmed by Adam Clarke in his extensive Bible commentary in 1831.

Update: As Rome or Vatican City’s days weren’t numbered in 2016, I have argued here that Adam Clarke’s prediction can be erreneous with one year’s margin as the first pope who rose to the head of papal states wasn’t actually Pope Stephen II in 756 but his successor Paul I in 757. So although Papal States was created in 756, Stephen II wasn’t the first pope who inherit his position as ”follower of Saint Peter” as ecclesiastical and temporal authority because papal states was created four years after his induction and thus making Pope Paul I the first temporal ruler and not Pope Stephen II. This calculation would be also compatible with other non-related prediction which indicates that the end of the times of gentiles will occur in 2017 (see prophecy of Judah Ben Samuel from 13th Century).

I have to accept that if nothing momentous and fateful happen in this year 2016 concerning the Rome and papacy, this will comprise a very grave problem for my book’s framework – not only for the historicistic explanation of Daniel 7 but also for this integrated system of eschatology itself. This brings me to the another reason, Tom and Chris, why I decided to approach you. I think that your book’s cover and its content concerning the apocalyptic beliefs (i.e. Mahdism) of ISIS, is very prophetic and alarming. And it speak very strongly on behalf of Clarke’s interprention for vision of Daniel 7 (which belonged to long eschatological tradition where there was many learned me like Isaac Newton and others who tried to establish valid calculation for destruction of papacy and return of Jesus through the centuries). By the way, just for this moment when I write this Turkey launched Operation Euphrates Shield in Northern Syria (where Dabiq lies). Because this military operation is backed by US and EU – despite recent rift between West and Turkey which is pulling the Turkey toward Russia – it may lead to fateful battle in Dabiq when ISIS will think that it is right moment to attack against Vatican City according to prophecy of Hadiths. This month marks the five hundredth anniversary of the Battle of Marj Dabiq between Ottoman Empire and Mamluk Sultanate of Egypt and the Levant of which outcome was more important – from Turkish perspective – than outcome of Sykes-Picot Pact.

When I wrote Chapter 10 of my book in May-June 2004 where I was reasoning on behalf of Clarke’s interprention, I was barely heard of ISIS let alone that I had know about its intentions against the Rome. It wasn’t until Paris terror attack on Friday 13 November 2015 when Europe woke up to threat of the ISIS upon the European cities including Vatican City (and especially towards it as we now know from the Mahdists beliefs of IS). But there seem to be also the prophecy of St. Malachy which supports this Adam Clarke’s prediction about destruction of ”City of Seven Hills” in 2016. So if this prediction come true, you and all Christians should be aware that it wasn’t only fulfillment of prophecy of St. Malachy but also prophecy of Book of Daniel itself and that indicates that time of the final Antichrist and Second Coming is then imminent (see Dan. 7:13, notice that this verse may refer not Jesus’s return to Mount of Olives but rapture of the Church because it says that ”Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him.”).

By the Way, Seventh Day Adventists teach that Papacy’s 1260 years (day to year principle which is totally Biblical way of interpretation like demonstrated in Leviticus 25:1-8, Ezekiel 4:6, Daniel 9:24) fulfilled in 538 – 1798 when Napoleon Bonaparte invaded Rome and deposed Pope Pius VI marking the first disestablishment of Papal States and thus Pope’s temporal power. But in fact this wasn’t the final deathblow to Papacy because Papal States was restored after Napoleon was defeated in Battle of Waterloo in 1815. After that there was also 2nd Disestablishment of Papal States but temporal power of Papacy was once again restored in 1929 when Vatican City (most smallest sovereign state in the world) was created in Lateran Treaty between fascist Italy and Pope Pius XI. So since Papal States was created in 756 in donation of Pepin the Short, political power of Popes has continued until this day.

It has not anymore as powerful as it was in Middle Ages and Early Modern Ages (even if there is some conspiracy theories which says that its power behind the scenes is more greater than we think), but it is still political power – ”little horn” if you will. Besides Pope’s temporal power didn’t start in 538 or before 756 when Papal States was born. Adventists’s eschatology just doesn’t fit into history of Papacy let alone Scriptural requirements in Daniel 7:8, 20 and 24 (because ”three of the first horns plucked up by the roots” before the rise of Papacy didn’t happen before 756 as demonstrated in my book). Thus Adventists’s historicistic eschatology is undated and invalid especially as we now that ”kingdom and dominion, and the greatness of the kingdom under the whole heaven, shall be given to the people of the saints of the most High” (verse 27) didn’t followed the 1798 or 1844 (another fanciful ”prophetic year” of Adventists’s eschatology).

There is also more profound theological results which are deluded from those erreous views relating to eschatology of Seventh Day Adventists. This branch of Christianity is the Sabbatical movement like modern Hebrew Roots Movement what you criticized in page 219-220 of your book (and rightly so). Other of my two older brothers is currently part of this heretical HRM movement (or ”Yeshua Movement” as we call it in our family) and disciple of ”Bishop” Dominiquae Bierman, but I don’t want to disparage or judge him because Paul said in Roman 14:4 – 6 that we have no authority to judge our brothers in Christ if they want to keep a sabbath or doesn’t want to eat some foods and vice versa. Seventh Day Adventists and Hebrew Roots Movement says that Emperor Constantine the Great and/or Papacy ”changed times and laws” according to prophecy of Daniel 7:25.

So they associates this to Sunday Sabbath which is honoring, as they say, the ancient Roman Sun god Sol Invictus (as well as the Christmas day though early Christians celebrated the Christmas day as a day of the birth of Our Savior decades before Constantine the Great according to ancient Jewish tradition that Jesus was conceived during the Pesach). But as prophecy goes on, ”and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time”, this should mean that the time of Sunday Sabbath should last from 756 until 2016. But origin of Sunday as the ecclesiastical holy day is more older than that. Furthermore they seem to be ignorant that Hebrew word for feasts like sabbaths and religious lunar festivals is moed (Strong’s Hebrew 4150) as it used in context of sabbaths in Lamentations 2:6. But a word which is used in Dan. 7:25 is not moed but zeman (Strong 2166) which means ”appointed period or epochs. Following examples are illustratives:

  • And he [God of Israel] changeth the times and the seasons [zeman]: he removeth kings, and setteth up kings: he giveth wisdom unto the wise, and knowledge to them that know understanding (Dan. 2:21).
  • Until the Ancient of days came, and judgment was given to the saints of the most High; and the time [zeman] came that the saints possessed the kingdom (Dan. 7:22).
  • As concerning the rest of the beasts, they had their dominion taken away: yet their lives were prolonged for a season [zeman] and time (Dan. 7:12).

So it is the great historical epochs – not the Hebrew feasts – what Papacy will change during her 1260 year reign. Can anyone dispute this in the light of the Papal history. Without papacy there would not be neither Middle Ages or Modern Ages because events of those historical periods are intimately connected to history of Popedom. But so much for that. I’ll not write much more about my book’s studies and findings, but I say yet just few remarks which concerns the shocking reality behind the facade of British royal family. If you put on Google Search ”British royal family and illuminati” you will find a countless number of websites and Youtube videos that connects this family to so called Illuminati and secret societies and conspiracies – of which some sound even preposterous, e.g. David Icke’s theories which connects them to some kind of Nephilim/Anunnaki races or creatures that are in fact reptilian humanoid/demons from another dimension in disguise of human flesh but who shape shift back to their orginal form during the satanic rituals. This is what David Icke actually claimed in all seriousness in his book The Biggest Secret (1999) and that has become ever since a some kind Internet phenomenon with peoples who try to unmask this thru pictures that supposed to ”prove” this weird theory.

However, seemingly preposterous of this claim hide more objective truth behind all this. When it comes to those ”investigators” of Internet, their claims are usually poorly documented and based on the mere rumors and low quality Youtube videos. They don’t mention their orginal sources and when they do these are satires from the fake ”news sites” (like recent claim that President Putin refused to shake hands with Queen Elizabeth because he knew that he is not a human but reptilian). In Finland we have a lot of books of the New World Order, Illuminati, Freemansonry, Bilderberg Group, etc, so I know this field quite well. Especially in my teen age I devoured many books and Internet articles on this topic. It was in the same context I started to explore this Prince Charles theory, when I came across into those claims in Internet that Prince Charles is not only a part of satanic Illuminati but its ultimate leader (Cutting Edge Ministry for example claimed so in their articles).

Of course when I got older I started to guestioning is there even such thing as ”Illuminati” and I began to appreciate more academic studies and knowledge. But after years of research, I’m convinced that there is something very sinister in British royal family which has been concealed from the sight of average person. This was the subject of my book’s fifth and last part (Chapter 12). As we approach this field we have to ask ourselves why there is so many books and documentaries which provides some weight for the claim that British royal family and especially Prince Charles was behind the car ”accident” of Princess Diana (accusation of which most famous supporter is billionaire Mohammed Al-Fayed, father of Dodi who died with Diana in that fateful car). For example, The Princess Diana Conspiracy by Alan Power (Probity Press, 2013), according to its publisher, ”shows evidence of murder that any honest court would accept.” If you find Keith Allen’s documentary Unlawful Killing which was shown in Cannes, I recommend to watch it.

Indeed, a letter from Diana herself proves that she feared that she will die in the car ”accident” that would be orchestrated by her husband Prince Charles (this is know as the so called Mishcon Note but there seem to be also other version on it that was directed to Paul Burrel). But if Princess of Wales was murdered, more important question is why? Does this have really anything to do with the Illuminati? Or is this quite far-fetched conclusion? In Chapter 12 I have provided some well-documented motives for that why Diana was murdered. Those motives I have found from the leaked news reports (not from the satire news) and Alan Power confirms this in his own book. Princess Diana knew that there was a obscene and unmoral sex rings inside the Buckingham Palace and House of Windsor what Prince Charles tolerated. Prince Charles himself was in homosexual relationship with many of his servants. Camilla wasn’t Charles’s real love but mere decoy what Charles exploited for his own ends – just like Diana told in her letter to Paul Burrel.

Those revelations are confirmed recently in American tabloid paper Globe but their origin does not come from gossip but from well-documented information of many leakers of Palace (men like George Anthony Smith who mainstream media claimed falsely that he had retreated from his accusations but in fact he disclaimed this sharply even if they tried to silence him with bribes). This is not only important because it seem to confirm the prophecy of Daniel 11:37 which states that Antichrist is homosexual who will not show regard ”for the desire of women” (remember that when he married his bride in 1981 he stated in public TV-program that he doesn’t know ”what in love means”), but also because it lead us to more infernal revelations about the royal family’s secret life behind the gates.

express-savilePrincess Diana was going to reveal those dark secrets of House of Windsor in prerecorded video message she made just few months before her death on 31 August 1997. After death of Jimmy Savile and subsequent revelations of ITV, it unrolled with its all horrors to the awareness of British people and the world via official police investigation (Operaatio Yewtree), that Savile – who was knight of OBE (Order of British Empire) and who has been one of the most closest friend of Prince Charles for decades – was a most prolific sexual predator in the British history who preyed the children and elderly as well, male and female. He was also a necrophile and practicing satanist who participated to ritual abuse of children in Black Masses.

But Jimmy Savile was only part of more broader club and ring of influential VIP pedophiles of whom many were close associates of British royal family. There had been several accusations over last 50 decades or more that many prominent members of British royal family are involved in ritual abuse of the children in day care and orphanage centers or indigenous peoples’s residential school. This include among others Louis Mountbatten, 1st Earl Mountbatten of Burma, uncle of Prince Philip, Prince Philip himself (whose foster parent was his twisted uncle George Mountbatten, 2nd Marquess of Milford Haven, who was notorious for his pornography collection which depicted early black and white scenes of heinous sex acts, including sex between adults and children, children and animals).

There are in fact many well-documented cases and accusations that royal family of Britis isles – and not only them but also royal families of Belgium and Holland, who are their close associates and relatives – is involved in ritual sex magic and perverse sex rituals and even ritual murders of some occult circles. Operaatio Yewtree led to more broader investigation of Scotland Yard where London police has been investigating the claims that mr. Savile wasn’t just lone pervert but part of wide sex ring of influential pedophiles and sex offenders which includes some late and current MP’s, PM’s, judges, celebrities and persons who works for royal family. In recent years there has been many revelations in British media about this VIP sex ring. For example, Daily Mail reported on October 1 2008 that ”Buckingham Palace butler ’ran paedophile sex ring while working for the Royal Family’”. This is just one example of many similar reports which I have documented in details in my book.

Most horrendous details about this royal sex ring are presented in the long article of Joël van der Reijden which is based on research of Belgian investigative journalists Marie-Jeanne Van Heeswyck, Annemie Bulté ja Douglas De Coninck in their book of 500 pages. His articles are so profoundly documented that even History professor at Harvard University, many foreign policy experts and Ph.D.’s are praising his studies. You can’t dismiss his profound studies very easily as ”conspiracy theory”. Another man who is offering many details and profoundly documented information about this influential sex-ring inside Vatican and British royal family, is Kevin Annet, Nobel Peace Prize Nominee in 2013, 2014 and 2015 (so his website claims), in his website http://itccs.org/. First mentioned is investigation into notorious Dutroux case and conspiracy behind it. This conspiracy reveals the real face of Belgian royal family of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha.

As I said previously, Saxe-Coburg-Gotha is German noble bloodline of which British royal family also springs from. Real family name of Queen Elizabeth II is not Windsor but Saxe-Coburg-Gotha because Prince Albert – husband of Queen Victoria – was nephew of King Leopold I Belgium (Queen Victoria was also his niece). His son Leopold II, second king of Belgium, was one of the most notoriuous war criminal of late 19th and early 20th Century. In his crimes against humanity he can compete with Hitler, Stalin and Pol Pot. As judicial documents and newspapers from 1880’s shows, he was also pedophile who was involved with pimp Mary Frances Jeffries in so called white slavery and child prostitution in London underworld. In fact Leopold II was a good friend of Queen Victoria and Prince Albert. In 1866 he was granted a knighthood of Order of the Garter which is the most greatest honor what sovereign of British Empire can confer upon his/her friends and subjects.

In books like Conspirators’ Hierarchy: The Story OfThe Committee Of 300 (1992) by John Coleman, it’s claimed that all criminal syndicates behind the New World Order plan to create one world goverment, economy and religion, are governed by 300 powerful men who are in turn governed by Order of the Garter and thus Elizabeth II of United Kingdom. According to Coleman and Lyndon H. LaRouche whom you also mentioned in your book, secretive organizations like Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission, Club of Rome and others, are just front of this more secretive group of Committee Of 300 whose real head is Elizabeth II and her first-born – heir to the throne – Prince of Wales. Wikipedia says about this brotherhood: ”Membership in the Order is strictly limited and includes the Monarch, the Prince of Wales, not more than 24 companion members, and various supernumerary members. The monarch alone can grant membership. He or she is known as the Sovereign of the Garter, and the Prince of Wales is known as a Royal Knight Companion of the Garter.” List of Knights and Ladies of the Garter since 1348 in Wikipedia is really revealing, but I will return to this later.

But what does this have to do with Bavarian Illuminati of Adam Weishaupt? When it comes to conspiracy theories I am today very critical of them all because they seem to be more prone to disinformation than any other area of investigation. Conspiracy theories are often paranoid nonsense which are spreading the hate against certain group of people. There are countless examples of preposterous conspiracy theories (like one which claims that Earth is flat like pancake and NASA and all scientist since time of Copernicus are concealing the Earth-center universe – I’m not joking, go to Youtube and search ”round earth debunked”). When Donald Trump is showing ”OK” hand gesture in his rallies, conspiracy enthusiasts are screaming that he is a part of Illuminati because this hand gesture is supposedly ”666”. My intention is not offend anyone who believes so, but this kind of conspiracy theories are decrying the real ones.

Before I dare to say that someone is part of Illuminati – if there is even such group today – I need a hard proof. Like I said, in my teenage I read many conspiracy books about Illuminati and New World Order. Also this blueprint for three world wars of Albert Pike and Giuseppe Mazzini was familiar to me before I read your book, but I appreciate your investigative and sceptical – but not too sceptical – style where you mentioned the orginal sources and so on. It is commonly claimed that Albert Pike and Giuseppe Mazzini were leaders of Illuminati in 19th Century. I don’t know which are orginal sources for this claim and is there any historical background support for this claim. It is undoubtedly historical fact that Albert Pike was high-decree Freemason and unashamed luciferianist (luciferianists like Pike believe that Lucifer is not Satan but a good guy who opposes the evil Jehovah).

But was he part of Illuminati? This is only circumstantial because after 1785 Bavarian Illuminati went underground and nested into highest decrees of Freemansonry. I believe there is more proof that current members of British royal family are members of Illuminati than there is proof that Pike was member of Illuminati. We can know this from Bavarian Illuminati’s most earliest recorded members. Many of its most influential members were friends of George III, King of England during the American Revolutionary War (1775–1783) and also members of Order of the Garter. Although I know that many founding fathers of US were also Freemasons, I think it would be fair to say that your war of indenpendence against the British Empire was actually the war against the Anglo-Germanic Illuminati which was born in the same year as your own nation.

My intention is not boost any nationalistic ecstasy, but it is a historical fact that British Empire of George III and Bavarian Illuminati of Adam Weishaupt were allies at that time. Just look at this Wikipedia’s article on historical Illuminati members and compare it to this member list of Order of the Garter. We find here Duke Ferdinand of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel, German-Prussian field marshal, who led an Anglo-German army in Western Germany which successfully repelled French attempts to occupy Hanover behalf George II of Great Britain who was also King of Hanover. George II was from the Germanic House of Hanover which ruled the United Kingdom until the death of Queen Victoria in 1901. After that its place took another Germanic House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha. We find here Ernest II, Duke of Saxe-Gotha-Altenburg who, according to Wikipedia, ”became a member of the Bavarian Illuminati under the name of Quintus Severus and/or Timoleon, and in 1784, he was made Supervisor of Abessinien (a name for Upper Saxony). In 1787, he granted Adam Weishaupt, the founder of the secret society, asylum in Gotha.”

They both were leading Freemasons in Germany and also honorable knights in Order of the Garter serving the George III of Great Britain. At that time when Ernest II joined Illuminati one of its leading member was Adolph Freiherr Knigge who was born in Electorate of Hanover. That area in Germany was under direct control of King of England. Ernest II himself was first cousin of George III of England (via his mother Princess Augusta of Saxe-Gotha-Altenburg). Also Prince Charles of Hesse-Kassel was member of Illuminati (although not member of the Garter). He ruled the twin duchies of Schleswig-Holstein, area which give family name to Prince Philip’s royal house of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg. His mother was Princess Mary of Great Britain, daughter of King George II. Thus also Prince Charles of Hesse-Kassel and George III were first cousins.

Frederick Christian II, Duke of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Augustenburg was member (of the Illuminati, not the Garter). This was part of same family branch of which Prince Philip descends from. Already mentioned Ernest II was not only first cousin of George III but also direct ancestor of Queen Elizabeth II. His son Augustus, Duke of Saxe-Gotha-Altenburg – who was also Illuminati member and who wrote first modern novel which commended homosexuality – was grandfather of Prince Albert, hubby of Queen Victoria.

So it is more than plausible that Albert and Victoria were also Illuminati members as well as their later offspring. It isn’t inessential that according to history books members of Illuminati infiltrated to highest degrees of Freemansonry after 1785 when Bavarian ruler Charles Theodore outlawed their activitity and British royal family has been ruler of worldwide Freemansonry (or at least of United Grand Lodge of England) since early 18th Century. This was confirmed in December 2012 when official magazine of United Grand Lodge uncovered all its royal leaders since 1738. At the time when Pike and Mazzini supposedly wrote down this secret plan for three world wars, Head of Freemansonry in British Empire was then Prince of Wales, later King Edward VII who followed his mother Queen Victoria to British throne in 1901. Prince Edward was made Grand Master of United Grand Lodge in 1874.

So in light of Pike’s Morals and Dogma and other writings – which says that grand masters of Freemansonry worship Lucifer – Edward VII was in reality world’s most powerful Luciferist at the Victorian era when British Empire became the greatest and wealthiest empire in world history. Just like Edward VII also his grandchildren Edward VIII, George VI (daddy of current Queen), and their brother Prince George, Duke of Kent (father of current grand master Prince Edward, Duke of Kent), were leaders of British Freemansonry during WWII. Although Prince Charles is not a Freemason, his father Prince Philip is (Master Mason in Navy Lodge, No. 2612). Besides Prince Charles is the most avowed occultist and Luciferist in royal history as he himself clearly demonstrate in his book Harmony (2010). Among others, this book praise openly ancient Egyptian mystery religions (he mentions also Ma’at goddess as you did on page 353 of your book). He supports gnostic texts like Gospel of Mary and Emerald Tablet of occult Hermeticism.

Many notoriuous occultists and satanists like Aleister Crowley have studied and promoted the occult teachings of Emerald Tablet. In his book Prince of Wales also implies that Jesus story of New Testament was plagiarized from Egyptian Osiris/Horus myth, says that understanding the hidden message of occult and antichristian children books of Philip Pullman and J.K. Rowling, is key to salvation of the world. He also suggests that he is a new Christ who was sended upon the Earth for purpose – to save it and heal it from its all wounds. Like Graham Smith, of the anti-monarchy group Republic, said in Daily Mail on 30 July 2010: ”He is under the impression he has been sent to save the world and deliver us from our sins. It’s quite delusional.” Althought unknow fact to most prophecy watchers, but real Prince Charles is a messianic lunatic – like Hitler was – and this has become a concern for many in United Kingdom (like Damien Thompson wrote in Telegraph 04/08/2010).

And he is already dragging some intoxicated fans to his cult of personality as you can see, for example, here. It is hard to manage all this information (of which I have told just tiny fraction) and to me it’s amazing how so few Christians are looking at the right direction on their prophetic studies. Just like all roads led to Rome in ancient times, all roads leads now to London and Buckingham Palace. Despite their seemingly normal appearance, behind the scenes British royal family is not what they seem to be. In spite of it was Pike’s letter to Mazzine genuine or not, there is some hard evidences (including family letters of Wilhelm II, German Emperor during WWI who was grandson of Queen Victoria and first cousin of George V) that British royal family planned, manipulated and funded both world wars. Every leader in both sides of WWI served the King of British empire in Order of the Garter (at least until 1915) and they were all first cousins.

When it comes to WWII, Emperor Hirohito of Imperial Japan, war criminal and ally of Hitler, was knight of the Garter who also served George V, Edward VIII and George VI until 1941 (and again Elizabeth II from 1971 onwards). Hitler himself was close friend of Edward VIII and British royal family in general. Hitler once told that late Queen mother Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon (mommy of Elizabeth II) was the most dangerous woman in Europe and he also said that Prince Charles of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha (not current heir to the throne) was the Antichrist. This ”Antichrist” – himself ally of Hitler – funded both world wars according to documentarist and investigator Chris Everard. If you want more information about this, I recommend that you buy his e-book, Conspiracy & the Crown (2016) from here. In this book Chris Everard does not provide evidences that British royal family also manipulated the First World War but historian Webster G. Tarpley, Ph.D. is supporting this hypothesis at here.

princesaudi
British royal family and notably Prince of Wales has been one of the main sponsors of ISIS and global jihadist movement inside the sunni islam, according to many independent studies supported by Wikileaks and others sources.

And when it comes to ISIS and possibly WWIII there is also many evidences for the accusation that British royal family is ultimate head behind the internetional jihadist sunni terrorists including groups like al-Qaida and ISIS. You can read many good articles about this from LaRouche movement’s EIR reports here and here. Information relating to this is just the tip of the iceberg. In fact Prince Charles dined with brother of Osama Bin Laden just two weeks after 9/11. Osama was not ”a black sheep” of his honest family as now revealed by declassified 28-pages of 9/11 comission. (look infowars report on here). Donald Trump said recently that Barack Obama created the IS and here is proof for that. It was USA and their allies in Middle East – especially Turkey and Saudi-Arabia – who created and funded the rise of ISIS to overthrow Syrian al-Assad dynasty. At head of this jihadist terrorist machine has always been the royal family of Saudi-Arabia and Great Britain. A lot of investigative jounalist are now uncovering this hidden truth behind the lies of mainstream media.

Senior members of British royal family like Prince Philip and Prince Charles are eco-fascist whose main goal is to establish global state of environmental fascism. (this was theme of my book’s seventh Chapter) Term ”eco-fascism” is not arbitrary, but based on thorough academic studies which shows how there is deep historical, philosophical and ethic relationship between fascism, environmentalism and European nobility (especially German nobility). Website http://ecofascism.com/ offers many academic studies on this subject. Its manager William Walter Kay states on his review for Encyclopedia of Religion and Nature (2005), ”This may startle Griffin: The most dangerous British Nazi in the 1930s was not some indigent handing out BUF flyers at bus-stops; it was the Duke of Windsor. The most dangerous eco-fascist and “religion of nature” preacher in the UK today is not some teenage stoner going door-to-door for Greenpeace, it’s Prince Charles.”

Eco-fascist like Prince Philip and his son believe that there is too many people in the world and that advanced civilization itself is destroying our planet. They are New Age hippies and nazis in the same pack. They say – publicly – that we must reduce the human population drastically (some 95 percent) meaning that they are calling for pagan human sacrifies for blood thristy Mother Earth. They follow teachings of Thomas Maltus, Charles Darwin and Francis Galton – teachings which are common to all neo-pagans, neo-nazis, satanists and wiccas. But all of their neo-pagan beliefs are bosh. I have to again recommend you to watch J.D. King’s excellent documentary film Blue which is exposing the lies of the environmental movement. At 36:00 there is statement of eco-fascist Maurice Strong who is friend and envoy of Prince Charles.

So here just few clues from my book. I apologize for my long letter and its all grammatical erros but I just felt that it was my duty to share my studies with you. My website address is https://samueltuominen.wordpress.com/ and my e-book address is here. (all written in Finnish).

Your sincerely Samuel Tuominen from Finland.

God Bless


One controversial documentary from 1990 which is assuring that members of British royal family are high-ranking satanists who worship Lucifer and abuse children in context of occult rituals to control their minds as part of Illuminati’s mind control programs (see part 3 before it is banned). 


Mainokset